These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28660680)

  • 1. Text mining for search term development in systematic reviewing: A discussion of some methods and challenges.
    Stansfield C; O'Mara-Eves A; Thomas J
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Sep; 8(3):355-365. PubMed ID: 28660680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
    Beynon R; Leeflang MM; McDonald S; Eisinga A; Mitchell RL; Whiting P; Glanville JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):MR000022. PubMed ID: 24022476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective comparison of evidence synthesis search strategies developed with and without text-mining tools.
    Paynter RA; Featherstone R; Stoeger E; Fiordalisi C; Voisin C; Adam GP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():350-360. PubMed ID: 33753230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits.
    Mahood Q; Van Eerd D; Irvin E
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 26052848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews.
    Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Mast F; Kleijnen J
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):510-520. PubMed ID: 29073718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the performance of methodological search filters to improve the efficiency of evidence information retrieval: five literature reviews and a qualitative study.
    Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Beale S; Boachie C; Duffy S; Fraser C; Harbour J; McCool R; Smith L
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Nov; 21(69):1-148. PubMed ID: 29188764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrieval of overviews of systematic reviews in MEDLINE was improved by the development of an objectively derived and validated search strategy.
    Lunny C; McKenzie JE; McDonald S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():107-18. PubMed ID: 26723872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews.
    Methley AM; Campbell S; Chew-Graham C; McNally R; Cheraghi-Sohi S
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Nov; 14():579. PubMed ID: 25413154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Searching for evidence or approval? A commentary on database search in systematic reviews and alternative information retrieval methodologies.
    Delaney A; Tamás PA
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):124-131. PubMed ID: 29106042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions.
    Golder S; McIntosh HM; Loke Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 May; 6():22. PubMed ID: 16681854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches.
    Bramer WM; de Jonge GB; Rethlefsen ML; Mast F; Kleijnen J
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2018 Oct; 106(4):531-541. PubMed ID: 30271302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of text-mining methodologies to aid the construction of search strategies in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy-a case study.
    O'Keefe H; Rankin J; Wallace SA; Beyer F
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Jan; 14(1):79-98. PubMed ID: 35841125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough.
    Boeker M; Vach W; Motschall E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Oct; 13():131. PubMed ID: 24160679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Topic search filters: a systematic scoping review.
    Damarell RA; May N; Hammond S; Sladek RM; Tieman JJ
    Health Info Libr J; 2019 Mar; 36(1):4-40. PubMed ID: 30578606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme.
    Briscoe S
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Apr; 8():153. PubMed ID: 25889619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Literature searching methods or guidance and their application to public health topics: A narrative review.
    Heath A; Levay P; Tuvey D
    Health Info Libr J; 2022 Mar; 39(1):6-21. PubMed ID: 34850535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the precision of search strategies for guideline surveillance.
    Casey M; Raynor M; Jacob C; Sharp S; McFarlane E
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):903-912. PubMed ID: 32985071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches.
    O'Mara-Eves A; Thomas J; McNaught J; Miwa M; Ananiadou S
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 4(1):5. PubMed ID: 25588314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.