297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28660725)
1. Automated robot-assisted surgical skill evaluation: Predictive analytics approach.
Fard MJ; Ameri S; Darin Ellis R; Chinnam RB; Pandya AK; Klein MD
Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 28660725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated surgical skill assessment in RMIS training.
Zia A; Essa I
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 May; 13(5):731-739. PubMed ID: 29549553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using Contact Forces and Robot Arm Accelerations to Automatically Rate Surgeon Skill at Peg Transfer.
Brown JD; O Brien CE; Leung SC; Dumon KR; Lee DI; Kuchenbecker KJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Sep; 64(9):2263-2275. PubMed ID: 28113295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical skill levels: Classification and analysis using deep neural network model and motion signals.
Nguyen XA; Ljuhar D; Pacilli M; Nataraja RM; Chauhan S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():1-8. PubMed ID: 31319938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Efficient Single-session Spatial Skill Trainer for Robot-assisted Surgery: A Randomized Trial.
Luko L; Parush A; Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Taitler A; Lowenstein L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):728-737.e2. PubMed ID: 31146028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic Image-Based Skill Assessment in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery.
Lajkó G; Nagyné Elek R; Haidegger T
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34450854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical skill level classification model development using EEG and eye-gaze data and machine learning algorithms.
Shafiei SB; Shadpour S; Mohler JL; Sasangohar F; Gutierrez C; Seilanian Toussi M; Shafqat A
J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):2963-2971. PubMed ID: 37864129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using objective robotic automated performance metrics and task-evoked pupillary response to distinguish surgeon expertise.
Nguyen JH; Chen J; Marshall SP; Ghodoussipour S; Chen A; Gill IS; Hung AJ
World J Urol; 2020 Jul; 38(7):1599-1605. PubMed ID: 31346762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a technical checklist for the assessment of suturing in robotic surgery.
Guni A; Raison N; Challacombe B; Khan S; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4402-4407. PubMed ID: 30194643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Machine Learning based Classification of Local Robotic Surgical Skills in a Training Tasks Set.
Juarez-Villalobos L; Hevia-Montiel N; Perez-Gonzalez J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():4596-4599. PubMed ID: 34892239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Towards near real-time assessment of surgical skills: A comparison of feature extraction techniques.
Anh NX; Nataraja RM; Chauhan S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Apr; 187():105234. PubMed ID: 31794913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cognitive skills assessment during robot-assisted surgery: separating the wheat from the chaff.
Guru KA; Esfahani ET; Raza SJ; Bhat R; Wang K; Hammond Y; Wilding G; Peabody JO; Chowriappa AJ
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):166-74. PubMed ID: 24467726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Task analysis of laparoscopic camera control schemes.
Ellis RD; Munaco AJ; Reisner LA; Klein MD; Composto AM; Pandya AK; King BW
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Dec; 12(4):576-584. PubMed ID: 26648563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance.
Reiley CE; Akinbiyi T; Burschka D; Chang DC; Okamura AM; Yuh DD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 135(1):196-202. PubMed ID: 18179942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An automatic skill evaluation framework for robotic surgery training.
Peng W; Xing Y; Liu R; Li J; Zhang Z
Int J Med Robot; 2019 Feb; 15(1):e1964. PubMed ID: 30281892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted ex vivo neobladder reconstruction: preliminary results of surgical skill evaluation.
Chen Z; Terlizzi S; Da Col T; Marzullo A; Catellani M; Ferrigno G; De Momi E
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Dec; 17(12):2315-2323. PubMed ID: 35802223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Surgical Devices Using an Artificial Pediatric Thoracic Model: A Comparison Between Robot-Assisted Thoracoscopic Suturing Versus Conventional Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Suturing.
Takazawa S; Ishimaru T; Harada K; Deie K; Hinoki A; Uchida H; Sugita N; Mitsuishi M; Iwanaka T; Fujishiro J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 May; 28(5):622-627. PubMed ID: 29406817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Motion control skill assessment based on kinematic analysis of robotic end-effector movements.
Liang K; Xing Y; Li J; Wang S; Li A; Li J
Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 28660644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motion analysis of the JHU-ISI Gesture and Skill Assessment Working Set using Robotics Video and Motion Assessment Software.
Lefor AK; Harada K; Dosis A; Mitsuishi M
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Dec; 15(12):2017-2025. PubMed ID: 33025366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
