These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28661216)

  • 1. Luteal-phase protocol in poor ovarian response: a comparative study with an antagonist protocol.
    Wu Y; Zhao FC; Sun Y; Liu PS
    J Int Med Res; 2017 Dec; 45(6):1731-1738. PubMed ID: 28661216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Initiation of ovarian stimulation independent of the menstrual cycle: a case-control study.
    Buendgen NK; Schultze-Mosgau A; Cordes T; Diedrich K; Griesinger G
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 288(4):901-4. PubMed ID: 23545834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following luteal GnRH antagonist administration in patients with severe early OHSS.
    Lainas GT; Kolibianakis EM; Sfontouris IA; Zorzovilis IZ; Petsas GK; Lainas TG; Tarlatzis BC
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Jul; 28(7):1929-42. PubMed ID: 23624582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer treatment compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study.
    Wei LH; Ma WH; Tang N; Wei JH
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 55(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 26927248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol.
    Hohmann FP; Macklon NS; Fauser BC
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2003 Jan; 88(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 12519847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Live birth rates after modified natural cycle compared with high-dose FSH stimulation using GnRH antagonists in poor responders.
    Lainas TG; Sfontouris IA; Venetis CA; Lainas GT; Zorzovilis IZ; Tarlatzis BC; Kolibianakis EM
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 26307091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GnRH antagonist and letrozole co-treatment in diminished ovarian reserve patients: a proof-of-concept study.
    Olgan S; Humaidan P
    Reprod Biol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):105-110. PubMed ID: 28173995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonsupplemented luteal phase characteristics after the administration of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin, recombinant luteinizing hormone, or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce final oocyte maturation in in vitro fertilization patients after ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and GnRH antagonist cotreatment.
    Beckers NG; Macklon NS; Eijkemans MJ; Ludwig M; Felberbaum RE; Diedrich K; Bustion S; Loumaye E; Fauser BC
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2003 Sep; 88(9):4186-92. PubMed ID: 12970285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist trigger of ovulation with aggressive luteal phase support for patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.
    Liang IT; Huang HY; Wu HM; Wang HS; Yu HT; Huang SY; Chang CL; Soong YK
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 54(5):583-7. PubMed ID: 26522115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Daily low-dose hCG stimulation during the luteal phase combined with GnRHa triggered IVF cycles without exogenous progesterone: a proof of concept trial.
    Andersen CY; Elbaek HO; Alsbjerg B; Laursen RJ; Povlsen BB; Thomsen L; Humaidan P
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2387-95. PubMed ID: 26209535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is feasible for producing competent oocytes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment, with optimal pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.
    Kuang Y; Hong Q; Chen Q; Lyu Q; Ai A; Fu Y; Shoham Z
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 24161646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the standard GnRH antagonist protocol and the luteal phase estradiol/GnRH antagonist priming protocol in poor ovarian responders.
    Mutlu MF; Mutlu İ; Erdem M; Güler İ; Erdem A
    Turk J Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 47(2):470-475. PubMed ID: 28425233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beneficial effect of luteal-phase GnRH agonist administration on embryo implantation after ICSI in both GnRH agonist- and antagonist-treated ovarian stimulation cycles.
    Tesarik J; Hazout A; Mendoza-Tesarik R; Mendoza N; Mendoza C
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Oct; 21(10):2572-9. PubMed ID: 16926261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-antagonist luteolysis during the preceding mid-luteal phase is a feasible protocol in ovarian hyperstimulation before in vitro fertilization.
    Fridén BE; Nilsson L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):812-6. PubMed ID: 16026411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of estrogen priming through luteal phase and stimulation phase in poor responders in in-vitro fertilization.
    Chang EM; Han JE; Won HJ; Kim YS; Yoon TK; Lee WS
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2012 Mar; 29(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 22160464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High ovarian response does not jeopardize ongoing pregnancy rates and increases cumulative pregnancy rates in a GnRH-antagonist protocol.
    Fatemi HM; Doody K; Griesinger G; Witjes H; Mannaerts B
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):442-52. PubMed ID: 23136144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The addition of gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist to routine luteal phase support in intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer cycles: a randomized clinical trial.
    Yıldız GA; Şükür YE; Ateş C; Aytaç R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():66-70. PubMed ID: 25238659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of luteal estradiol patch and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppression protocol before gonadotropin stimulation versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol for patients with a history of poor in vitro fertilization outcomes.
    Weitzman VN; Engmann L; DiLuigi A; Maier D; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):226-30. PubMed ID: 18675961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged ≥35 years: a randomized controlled trial.
    Vuong TN; Phung HT; Ho MT
    Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1188-95. PubMed ID: 25740882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle.
    Kahraman K; Berker B; Atabekoglu CS; Sonmezer M; Cetinkaya E; Aytac R; Satiroglu H
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2437-44. PubMed ID: 18555238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.