BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28661217)

  • 1. A comprehensive framework for evaluating the environmental health and safety implications of engineered nanomaterials.
    Boyes WK; Thornton BLM; Al-Abed SR; Andersen CP; Bouchard DC; Burgess RM; Hubal EAC; Ho KT; Hughes MF; Kitchin K; Reichman JR; Rogers KR; Ross JA; Rygiewicz PT; Scheckel KG; Thai SF; Zepp RG; Zucker RM
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2017 Oct; 47(9):767-810. PubMed ID: 28661217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental and health effects of nanomaterials in nanotextiles and façade coatings.
    Som C; Wick P; Krug H; Nowack B
    Environ Int; 2011 Aug; 37(6):1131-42. PubMed ID: 21397331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk.
    Cohen Y; Rallo R; Liu R; Liu HH
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):802-12. PubMed ID: 23138971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Review on the Environmental Fate Models for Predicting the Distribution of Engineered Nanomaterials in Surface Waters.
    Suhendra E; Chang CH; Hou WC; Hsieh YC
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jun; 21(12):. PubMed ID: 32604975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic Probabilistic Modeling of Environmental Emissions of Engineered Nanomaterials.
    Sun TY; Bornhöft NA; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 May; 50(9):4701-11. PubMed ID: 27043743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling flows and concentrations of nine engineered nanomaterials in the Danish environment.
    Gottschalk F; Lassen C; Kjoelholt J; Christensen F; Nowack B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 May; 12(5):5581-602. PubMed ID: 26006129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment.
    Gottschalk F; Nowack B
    J Environ Monit; 2011 May; 13(5):1145-55. PubMed ID: 21387066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Envisioning Nano Release Dynamics in a Changing World: Using Dynamic Probabilistic Modeling to Assess Future Environmental Emissions of Engineered Nanomaterials.
    Sun TY; Mitrano DM; Bornhöft NA; Scheringer M; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 51(5):2854-2863. PubMed ID: 28157288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ecological nanotoxicology: integrating nanomaterial hazard considerations across the subcellular, population, community, and ecosystems levels.
    Holden PA; Nisbet RM; Lenihan HS; Miller RJ; Cherr GN; Schimel JP; Gardea-Torresdey JL
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):813-22. PubMed ID: 23039211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toxicity of engineered nanomaterials mediated by nano-bio-eco interactions.
    He X; Fu P; Aker WG; Hwang HM
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2018 Jan; 36(1):21-42. PubMed ID: 29297743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ONE Nano: NIEHS's strategic initiative on the health and safety effects of engineered nanomaterials.
    Schug TT; Johnson AF; Balshaw DM; Garantziotis S; Walker NJ; Weis C; Nadadur SS; Birnbaum LS
    Environ Health Perspect; 2013 Apr; 121(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 23407114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nanomaterials in the environment: from materials to high-throughput screening to organisms.
    Thomas CR; George S; Horst AM; Ji Z; Miller RJ; Peralta-Videa JR; Xia T; Pokhrel S; Mädler L; Gardea-Torresdey JL; Holden PA; Keller AA; Lenihan HS; Nel AE; Zink JI
    ACS Nano; 2011 Jan; 5(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 21261306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transparent stakeholder engagement in practice: Lessons learned from applying comprehensive environmental assessment to research planning for nanomaterials.
    Powers C; Hendren C; Wang A; Davis JM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Oct; 10(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 24729532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comprehensive probabilistic modelling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials.
    Sun TY; Gottschalk F; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
    Environ Pollut; 2014 Feb; 185():69-76. PubMed ID: 24220022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The need for novel approaches in ecotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials.
    Kumar A; Dhawan A; Shanker R
    J Biomed Nanotechnol; 2011 Feb; 7(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 21485813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developmental neurotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials: identifying research needs to support human health risk assessment.
    Powers CM; Bale AS; Kraft AD; Makris SL; Trecki J; Cowden J; Hotchkiss A; Gillespie PA
    Toxicol Sci; 2013 Aug; 134(2):225-42. PubMed ID: 23708405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis.
    Gottschalk F; Sonderer T; Scholz RW; Nowack B
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2010 May; 29(5):1036-48. PubMed ID: 20821538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A critical review of engineered nanomaterial release data: Are current data useful for material flow modeling?
    Caballero-Guzman A; Nowack B
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Jun; 213():502-517. PubMed ID: 26970875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influences of use activities and waste management on environmental releases of engineered nanomaterials.
    Wigger H; Hackmann S; Zimmermann T; Köser J; Thöming J; von Gleich A
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 535():160-71. PubMed ID: 25728395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ecotoxicity and analysis of nanomaterials in the aquatic environment.
    Farré M; Gajda-Schrantz K; Kantiani L; Barceló D
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2009 Jan; 393(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 18987850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.