These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28661402)

  • 1. CIOMS guidelines remain conservative about vulnerability and social justice.
    Ho CW
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(3):175-179. PubMed ID: 28661402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How the CIOMS guidelines contribute to fair inclusion of pregnant women in research.
    van der Graaf R; van der Zande ISE; van Delden JJM
    Bioethics; 2019 Mar; 33(3):367-373. PubMed ID: 30341918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From protectionism to inclusion: A New Zealand perspective on health-related research involving adults incapable of giving informed consent.
    Douglass A; Ballantyne A
    Bioethics; 2019 Mar; 33(3):374-382. PubMed ID: 30226646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research ethics revised: The new CIOMS guidelines and the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki in context.
    Ballantyne A; Eriksson S
    Bioethics; 2019 Mar; 33(3):310-311. PubMed ID: 30884547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research ethics for a globalised world: the revised CIOMS international guidelines.
    Ehni HJ; Wiesing U
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(3):165-168. PubMed ID: 28285263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjusting the focus: A public health ethics approach to data research.
    Ballantyne A
    Bioethics; 2019 Mar; 33(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 30667080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revised CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for Health-Related Research Involving Humans.
    van Delden JJ; van der Graaf R
    JAMA; 2017 Jan; 317(2):135-136. PubMed ID: 27923072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revised CIOMS research ethics guidance: on the importance of process for credibility.
    Schuklenk U
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(3):169-172. PubMed ID: 28285262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The history and moral foundations of human-subject research.
    Blustein J
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 86(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 17251690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human experimentation in developing countries: improving international practices by identifying vulnerable populations and allocating fair benefits.
    Farrell K
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2006; 9(1):136-61. PubMed ID: 17165228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefit sharing in the revised Indian National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants.
    Ravinetto R; Dierickx K
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2018; 3(3):204-209. PubMed ID: 30211675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vulnerability as a regulatory category in human subject research.
    Coleman CH
    J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 19245598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The CIOMS view on the use of placebo in clinical trials.
    Idänpään-Heikkilä JE; Fluss S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2004 Jan; 10(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14986767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Political legitimacy and research ethics.
    Smith MJ; Weinstock D
    Bioethics; 2019 Mar; 33(3):312-318. PubMed ID: 30136750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) Ethical Guidelines: advancements and unsolved topics in 2016 upgrade.
    Borgeat Meza M; Luengo-Charath X; Arancibia M; Madrid E
    Medwave; 2018 Apr; 18(2):e7208. PubMed ID: 29701729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response to open peer commentaries on "How to do research fairly in an unjust world".
    Ballantyne AJ
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):W4-6. PubMed ID: 20526959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical approval in studies raising consent issues.
    Nicholson C
    Nurs Times; 2015 Jan 14-20; 111(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 26021031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regulatory and ethical principles in research involving children and individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Yan EG; Munir KM
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 15580725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vulnerability in human research.
    Pieper IJ; Thomson CJH
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2020 May; 38(1):68-82. PubMed ID: 32342442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The perverse consequences of a proposed global tax on research.
    MacDonald C; Walton N
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 20526972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.