These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28662385)
1. Hepatic fat quantification using automated six-point Dixon: Comparison with conventional chemical shift based sequences and computed tomography. Shimizu K; Namimoto T; Nakagawa M; Morita K; Oda S; Nakaura T; Utsunomiya D; Yamashita Y Clin Imaging; 2017; 45():111-117. PubMed ID: 28662385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of a three-step magnetic resonance imaging approach for the assessment of hepatic steatosis in an asymptomatic study population. Hetterich H; Bayerl C; Peters A; Heier M; Linkohr B; Meisinger C; Auweter S; Kannengießer SA; Kramer H; Ertl-Wagner B; Bamberg F Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1895-904. PubMed ID: 26340812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between incidental fat deposition in the liver and pancreas in asymptomatic individuals. Aliyari Ghasabeh M; Shaghaghi M; Khoshpouri P; Pan L; Pandy A; Pandy P; Zhong X; Kannengiesser S; Kamel IR Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jan; 45(1):203-210. PubMed ID: 31482380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-invasive quantification of hepatic fat fraction by fast 1.0, 1.5 and 3.0 T MR imaging. Schuchmann S; Weigel C; Albrecht L; Kirsch M; Lemke A; Lorenz G; Warzok R; Hosten N Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 62(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 17267159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved T1, contrast concentration, and pharmacokinetic parameter quantification in the presence of fat with two-point Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Le Y; Dale B; Akisik F; Koons K; Lin C Magn Reson Med; 2016 Apr; 75(4):1677-84. PubMed ID: 25988338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D Multiecho Dixon for the Evaluation of Hepatic Iron and Fat in a Clinical Setting. Henninger B; Zoller H; Kannengiesser S; Zhong X; Jaschke W; Kremser C J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 28225576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Liver fat quantification by dual-echo MR imaging outperforms traditional histopathological analysis. Fischer MA; Raptis DA; Montani M; Graf R; Clavien PA; Nanz D; Alkadhi H; Scheffel H Acad Radiol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22841289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated two-point dixon screening for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis and siderosis: comparison with R2-relaxometry and chemical shift-based sequences. Henninger B; Zoller H; Rauch S; Schocke M; Kannengiesser S; Zhong X; Reiter G; Jaschke W; Kremser C Eur Radiol; 2015 May; 25(5):1356-65. PubMed ID: 25501270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of liver and muscular fat using contrast-enhanced Dual Source Dual Energy Computed Tomography compared to an established multi-echo Dixon MRI sequence. Gassenmaier S; Kähm K; Walter SS; Machann J; Nikolaou K; Bongers MN Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109845. PubMed ID: 34271430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of an Optimized Weighting Factor of Liver Parenchyma for Six-point Interference Dixon Fat Percentage Imaging Accuracy in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Rat Model. Lee O; Lee SJ; Yu SM Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1595-1602. PubMed ID: 29803754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hepatic fat quantification using chemical shift MR imaging and MR spectroscopy in the presence of hepatic iron deposition: validation in phantoms and in patients with chronic liver disease. Lee SS; Lee Y; Kim N; Kim SW; Byun JH; Park SH; Lee MG; Ha HK J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jun; 33(6):1390-8. PubMed ID: 21591008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liver fat quantification: Comparison of dual-echo and triple-echo chemical shift MRI to MR spectroscopy. Satkunasingham J; Besa C; Bane O; Shah A; de Oliveira A; Gilson WD; Kannengiesser S; Taouli B Eur J Radiol; 2015 Aug; 84(8):1452-1458. PubMed ID: 26047820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hepatic fat quantification in dual-layer computed tomography using a three-material decomposition algorithm. Demondion E; Ernst O; Louvet A; Robert B; Kafri G; Langzam E; Vermersch M Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3708-3718. PubMed ID: 37955671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of 2-point, 3-point, and 6-point Dixon magnetic resonance imaging with flexible echo timing for muscle fat quantification. Grimm A; Meyer H; Nickel MD; Nittka M; Raithel E; Chaudry O; Friedberger A; Uder M; Kemmler W; Quick HH; Engelke K Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 103():57-64. PubMed ID: 29803386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fat Quantification in the Vertebral Body: Comparison of Modified Dixon Technique with Single-Voxel Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Lee SH; Yoo HJ; Yu SM; Hong SH; Choi JY; Chae HD Korean J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 20(1):126-133. PubMed ID: 30627028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-invasive quantification of hepatic steatosis in living, related liver donors using dual-echo Dixon imaging and single-voxel proton spectroscopy. Krishan S; Jain D; Bathina Y; Kale A; Saraf N; Saigal S; Choudhary N; Baijal SS; Soin A Clin Radiol; 2016 Jan; 71(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 26555703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of Liver Fat Content With Unenhanced MDCT: Phantom and Clinical Correlation With MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction. Pickhardt PJ; Graffy PM; Reeder SB; Hernando D; Li K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):W151-W157. PubMed ID: 30016142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy. Peng XG; Ju S; Qin Y; Fang F; Cui X; Liu G; Ni Y; Teng GJ J Lipid Res; 2011 Oct; 52(10):1847-55. PubMed ID: 21737754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-invasive hepatic fat quantification: Can multi-echo Dixon help? Gupta A; Dixit R; Prakash A Radiol Bras; 2024; 57():e20230125. PubMed ID: 38993969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of Liver Fat Quantification With Advanced CT, MRI, and Ultrasound Techniques: Prospective Comparison With MR Spectroscopy. Kramer H; Pickhardt PJ; Kliewer MA; Hernando D; Chen GH; Zagzebski JA; Reeder SB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 27726414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]