BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28662454)

  • 1. Where's the beef? Retail channel choice and beef preferences in Argentina.
    Colella F; Ortega DL
    Meat Sci; 2017 Nov; 133():86-94. PubMed ID: 28662454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seasonality effects on consumers' preferences over quality attributes of different beef products.
    Ardeshiri A; Sampson S; Swait J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Nov; 157():107868. PubMed ID: 31234027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.
    Scozzafava G; Corsi AM; Casini L; Contini C; Loose SM
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mexican consumers at the point of meat purchase. Beef choice.
    Ngapo TM; Braña Varela D; Rubio Lozano MS
    Meat Sci; 2017 Dec; 134():34-43. PubMed ID: 28750333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer perception of health properties and of other attributes of beef as determinants of consumption and purchase decisions.
    Gutkowska K; Czarnecki J; Głąbska D; Guzek D; Batóg A
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2018; 69(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 30525333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spanish, French and British consumers' acceptability of Uruguayan beef, and consumers' beef choice associated with country of origin, finishing diet and meat price.
    Realini CE; Font i Furnols M; Sañudo C; Montossi F; Oliver MA; Guerrero L
    Meat Sci; 2013 Sep; 95(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 23644048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?
    Sonoda Y; Oishi K; Chomei Y; Hirooka H
    Meat Sci; 2018 Dec; 146():75-86. PubMed ID: 30103081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emerging markets for imported beef in China: Results from a consumer choice experiment in Beijing.
    Ortega DL; Hong SJ; Wang HH; Wu L
    Meat Sci; 2016 Nov; 121():317-323. PubMed ID: 27395825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of information on beef husbandry systems on consumers' preferences and willingness to pay.
    Risius A; Hamm U
    Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():9-14. PubMed ID: 27792916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beef quality labels: A combination of sensory acceptance test, stated willingness to pay, and choice-based conjoint analysis.
    Meyerding SGH; Gentz M; Altmann B; Meier-Dinkel L
    Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():324-333. PubMed ID: 29792892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of European beef: 2. Demographic factors have only minor effects on consumer scores and willingness to pay.
    Bonny SPF; Gardner GE; Pethick DW; Allen P; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF
    Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 28190414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of beef quality for Spanish and Brazilian consumers.
    Boito B; Lisbinski E; Campo MDM; Guerrero A; Resconi V; de Oliveira TE; Barcellos JOJ
    Meat Sci; 2021 Feb; 172():108312. PubMed ID: 33011632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beef consumer segment profiles based on information source usage in Poland.
    Żakowska-Biemans S; Pieniak Z; Gutkowska K; Wierzbicki J; Cieszyńska K; Sajdakowska M; Kosicka-Gębska M
    Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():105-113. PubMed ID: 27865127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes.
    Merlino VM; Borra D; Girgenti V; Dal Vecchio A; Massaglia S
    Meat Sci; 2018 Sep; 143():119-128. PubMed ID: 29738962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do demographic and beef eating preferences impact on South African consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for graded beef?
    Strydom P; Burrow H; Polkinghorne R; Thompson J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Apr; 150():122-130. PubMed ID: 30677552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of beef eating quality by Irish consumers.
    McCarthy SN; Henchion M; White A; Brandon K; Allen P
    Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():118-124. PubMed ID: 28522169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Capturing consumer value and clustering customer preferences in the Indonesian halal beef market.
    Mahbubi A; Uchiyama T; Hatanaka K
    Meat Sci; 2019 Oct; 156():23-32. PubMed ID: 31125944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors associated with consumer perception and conduct toward certified beef from Brazil.
    Brunoro JRP; Lopes MA; Demeu FA; Bruhn FRP; Rigueira LL; Faria PB; Rocha CMBMD; Contini E; Pacheco EO; Maia ÉM; Junqueira LV
    J Food Sci; 2020 May; 85(5):1542-1547. PubMed ID: 32271959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades.
    Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 27829474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding the role of information and taste heterogeneity in consumer preferences for functional beef: The case of the omega-3 enriched burger.
    Boncinelli F; Piracci G; Casini L
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108614. PubMed ID: 34229235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.