These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28662454)

  • 21. Consumer preferences for beef with improved nutrient profile1.
    Flowers S; McFadden BR; Carr CC; Mateescu RG
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Dec; 97(12):4699-4709. PubMed ID: 31628839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of hedonic evaluation on consumers' preferences for beef attributes including its enrichment with n-3 and CLA fatty acids.
    Baba Y; Kallas Z; Costa-Font M; Gil JM; Realini CE
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jan; 111():9-17. PubMed ID: 26331961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attitudes towards, and purchasing of, Scottish beef and beef products in Scotland - A short communication.
    Whybrow S; Macdiarmid JI
    Meat Sci; 2018 Nov; 145():150-153. PubMed ID: 29982067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Regional, socioeconomic and behavioural- impacts on consumer acceptability of beef in Northern Ireland, Republic of Ireland and Great Britain.
    Chong FS; Farmer LJ; Hagan TDJ; Speers JS; Sanderson DW; Devlin DJ; Tollerton IJ; Gordon AW; Methven L; Moloney AP; Kerry JP; O'Sullivan MG
    Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():86-95. PubMed ID: 31022586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Beef quality attributes: A systematic review of consumer perspectives.
    Henchion MM; McCarthy M; Resconi VC
    Meat Sci; 2017 Jun; 128():1-7. PubMed ID: 28160662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance and value of domestic beef steaks and steaks from a branded, Argentine beef program.
    Killinger KM; Calkins CR; Umberger WJ; Feuz DM; Eskridge KM
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3302-7. PubMed ID: 15542477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Meat packaging, preservation, and marketing implications: Consumer preferences in an emerging economy.
    Wang HH; Chen J; Bai J; Lai J
    Meat Sci; 2018 Nov; 145():300-307. PubMed ID: 30007176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A qualitative study of Southern U.S. consumers' top of the mind beliefs about the safety of local beef.
    Telligman AL; Worosz MR; Bratcher CL
    Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():1-10. PubMed ID: 27984187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hong Kong consumer preferences for Japanese beef: Label knowledge and reference point effects.
    Kikushima R; Nakajima S; Takano M; Ito N
    Anim Sci J; 2018 Oct; 89(10):1519-1529. PubMed ID: 30101514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of quality labels on the formation of preferences of lamb meat consumers. A Spanish case study.
    Bernabéu R; Rabadán A; El Orche NE; Díaz M
    Meat Sci; 2018 Jan; 135():129-133. PubMed ID: 28968556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Credence cues of pork are more important than consumers' culinary skills to boost their purchasing intention.
    Argemí-Armengol I; Villalba D; Ripoll G; Teixeira A; Álvarez-Rodríguez J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():11-21. PubMed ID: 30954794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers.
    Slade P
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():428-437. PubMed ID: 29501683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Credence quality coordination and consumers' willingness-to-pay for certified halal labelled meat.
    Verbeke W; Rutsaert P; Bonne K; Vermeir I
    Meat Sci; 2013 Dec; 95(4):790-7. PubMed ID: 23688800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.
    Wang J; Shen M; Gao Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30563258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Valuation of observable attributes in differentiated beef products in Chile using the hedonic price method.
    Fernández J; Melo O; Larraín R; Fernández M
    Meat Sci; 2019 Dec; 158():107881. PubMed ID: 31301889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Impact of the Food Labeling and Other Factors on Consumer Preferences Using Discrete Choice Modeling-The Example of Traditional Pork Sausage.
    Czine P; Török Á; Pető K; Horváth P; Balogh P
    Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32545561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analyzing the importance of attributes for Brazilian consumers to replace conventional beef with cultured meat.
    de Oliveira GA; Domingues CHF; Borges JAR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251432. PubMed ID: 33961686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preferences for lamb meat: a choice experiment for Spanish consumers.
    Gracia A; de-Magistris T
    Meat Sci; 2013 Oct; 95(2):396-402. PubMed ID: 23747635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How Consumers in the UK and Spain Value the Coexistence of the Claims Low Fat, Local, Organic and Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
    Akaichi F; Revoredo Giha C; Glenk K; Gil JM
    Nutrients; 2020 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31906308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Consumer Preferences for Traceable Food with Different Functions of Safety Information Attributes: Evidence from a Menu-Based Choice Experiment in China.
    Hou B; Hou J; Wu L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 31878189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.