These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28662850)

  • 21. Entrance surface dose measurement in pediatric patients undergoing common diagnostic x-ray examinations in black lion and Yekatit 12 Hospital Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    Teferi S; Admassie D; Abate T; Rao AD
    Ethiop Med J; 2011 Jan; 49(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 21456472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Workplace monitoring for exposures to radon and to other natural sources in Europe: integration of monitoring for internal and external exposures.
    Lopez MA; Currivan L; Falk R; Olko P; Wernli C; Castellani CM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(1):121-39. PubMed ID: 15574988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Double reading rates and quality assurance practices in Norwegian hospital radiology departments: two parallel national surveys.
    Lauritzen PM; Hurlen P; Sandbæk G; Gulbrandsen P
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 24425793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implementation of standards for individual monitoring in Europe.
    Fantuzzi E; Alves JG; Ambrosi P; Janzekovic H; Vartiainen E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(1):3-44. PubMed ID: 15574985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Applications of process improvement techniques to improve workflow in abdominal imaging.
    Tamm EP
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Mar; 41(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 26880172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automated quality assurance and patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology.
    Faulkner K; Chapple CL; Hedley P; Kotre CJ; Harrison RM
    J Biomed Eng; 1990 May; 12(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 2348711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Method of patient dose evaluation in the angiographic and interventional radiology procedures.
    Rivolta A; Emanuelli S; Tessarin C; Bresciani S; Genovese MG; Rogge D; Scielzo G
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):689-98. PubMed ID: 16437054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality initiatives: department scorecard: a tool to help drive imaging care delivery performance.
    Donnelly LF; Gessner KE; Dickerson JM; Koch BL; Towbin AJ; Lehkamp TW; Moskovitz J; Brody AS; Dumoulin CL; Jones BV
    Radiographics; 2010 Nov; 30(7):2029-38. PubMed ID: 20801869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality management system in the CIEMAT Radiation Dosimetry Service.
    Martín R; Navarro T; Romero AM; López MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):111-4. PubMed ID: 21131328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of medical physics in medical facilities.
    Szafran AJ; Brahmavar S
    Radiol Manage; 1986 Apr; 8(2):52-4. PubMed ID: 10287351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patient dosimetry in paediatric diagnostic radiology.
    Borisova R; Ingilizova Ch; Vassileva J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):155-9. PubMed ID: 18287192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Benefits and limitations for the use of radiation dose management systems in medical imaging. Practical experience in a university hospital.
    Vano E; Fernández JM; Ten JI; Sanchez RM
    Br J Radiol; 2022 May; 95(1133):20211340. PubMed ID: 35007182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exposing exposure: enhancing patient safety through automated data mining of nuclear medicine reports for quality assurance and organ dose monitoring.
    Ikuta I; Sodickson A; Wasser EJ; Warden GI; Gerbaudo VH; Khorasani R
    Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):406-13. PubMed ID: 22627599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality initiatives: lean approach to improving performance and efficiency in a radiology department.
    Kruskal JB; Reedy A; Pascal L; Rosen MP; Boiselle PM
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(2):573-87. PubMed ID: 22323617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiation dose to PET technologists and strategies to lower occupational exposure.
    Roberts FO; Gunawardana DH; Pathmaraj K; Wallace A; U PL; Mi T; Berlangieri SU; O'Keefe GJ; Rowe CC; Scott AM
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2005 Mar; 33(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 15731021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of methods to estimate the patient dose in interventional radiology.
    Kosunen A; Komppa T; Toivonen M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):178-84. PubMed ID: 16464835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tracking radiation for quality's sake.
    Taylor TK; Chu WK; Teten S
    Adm Radiol; 1989 Nov; 8(11):115-7. PubMed ID: 10296509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dose tracking and radiology department management.
    Kirova G; Georgiev E; Zasheva C; St Georges A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):62-6. PubMed ID: 25813480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparison of accreditation procedures, ISO 9000 certification procedures and total quality management. Personal experiences and application of quality assurance in a department of radiology and medical imaging].
    Duvauferrier R; Rolland Y; Philippe C; Milon J; de Korvin B; Rambeau M; Morcet N; Ramée A
    J Radiol; 1999 Apr; 80(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 10337574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.