543 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28662859)
1. Monolithic zirconia dental crowns. Internal fit, margin quality, fracture mode and load at fracture.
Schriwer C; Skjold A; Gjerdet NR; Øilo M
Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28662859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of preparation taper on the resistance to fracture of monolithic zirconia crowns.
Schriwer C; Gjerdet NR; Arola D; Øilo M
Dent Mater; 2021 Aug; 37(8):e427-e434. PubMed ID: 33910755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of margin design on fracture load of zirconia crowns.
Skjold A; Schriwer C; Øilo M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2019 Feb; 127(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 30467907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Load at fracture of monolithic and bilayered zirconia crowns with and without a cervical zirconia collar.
Øilo M; Kvam K; Gjerdet NR
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 26775244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns.
Sun T; Zhou S; Lai R; Liu R; Ma S; Zhou Z; Longquan S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():93-101. PubMed ID: 24762856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness.
Nakamura K; Harada A; Inagaki R; Kanno T; Niwano Y; Milleding P; Örtengren U
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015; 73(8):602-8. PubMed ID: 25635734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of artificial aging on high translucent dental zirconia: simulation of early failure.
Skjold A; Schriwer C; Gjerdet NR; Øilo M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2020 Dec; 128(6):526-534. PubMed ID: 33058363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro analysis of the fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia molar crowns with different occlusal thickness.
Sorrentino R; Triulzio C; Tricarico MG; Bonadeo G; Gherlone EF; Ferrari M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():328-333. PubMed ID: 27104931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and veneered zirconia crowns as a posterior implant restoration.
Kim JH; Lee SJ; Park JS; Ryu JJ
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23296031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture rate of 188695 lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic restorations after up to 7.5 years of clinical service: A dental laboratory survey.
Sulaiman TA; Abdulmajeed AA; Delgado A; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):807-810. PubMed ID: 31703926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of finish line design on stress distribution in bilayer and monolithic zirconia crowns: a three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Miura S; Kasahara S; Yamauchi S; Egusa H
Eur J Oral Sci; 2018 Apr; 126(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 29377334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fractographic analysis of 35 clinically fractured bi-layered and monolithic zirconia crowns.
Skjold A; Schriwer C; Gjerdet NR; Øilo M
J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104271. PubMed ID: 36041673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I
Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Veneering Methods on Zirconia Framework-Veneer Ceramic Adhesion and Fracture Resistance of Single Crowns.
Kanat-Ertürk B; Çömlekoğlu EM; Dündar-Çömlekoğlu M; Özcan M; Güngör MA
J Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 24(8):620-8. PubMed ID: 25319017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of various veneering techniques on mechanical strength of computer-controlled zirconia framework designs.
Kanat B; Cömlekoğlu EM; Dündar-Çömlekoğlu M; Hakan Sen B; Ozcan M; Ali Güngör M
J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):445-55. PubMed ID: 24417370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
