These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28663392)
1. Promising early results for trabecular metal acetabular components used at revision total hip arthroplasty: 42 acetabular revisions followed with radiostereometry in a prospective randomised trial. Mohaddes M; Shareghi B; Kärrholm J Bone Joint J; 2017 Jul; 99-B(7):880-886. PubMed ID: 28663392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jul; 100(13):1132-1140. PubMed ID: 29975265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High proximal migration in cemented acetabular revisions operated with bone impaction grafting; 47 revision cups followed with RSA for 17 years. Mohaddes M; Herberts P; Malchau H; Johanson PE; Kärrholm J Hip Int; 2017 May; 27(3):251-258. PubMed ID: 27886360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Results of a randomized controlled trial with five-year radiostereometric analysis results of vitamin E-infused highly crosslinked versus moderately crosslinked polyethylene in reverse total hip arthroplasty. Thoen PS; Nordsletten L; Pripp AH; Röhrl SM Bone Joint J; 2020 Dec; 102-B(12):1646-1653. PubMed ID: 33249906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparable Results With Porous Metal Augments in Combination With Either Cemented or Uncemented Cups in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of One Hundred Forty-Seven Revisions at a Mean of Five Years. Mahmoud AN; Sundberg M; Flivik G J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1612-1617. PubMed ID: 28062151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative long-term survivorship of uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Kremers HM; Howard JL; Loechler Y; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e82. PubMed ID: 22717834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local bisphosphonate reduces migration and formation of radiolucent lines adjacent to cemented acetabular components. Schilcher J; Palm L; Ivarsson I; Aspenberg P Bone Joint J; 2017 Mar; 99-B(3):317-324. PubMed ID: 28249970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Exeter Contemporary flanged cemented acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty. Maggs JL; Smeatham A; Whitehouse SL; Charity J; Timperley AJ; Gie GA Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 26920954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impaction bone grafting in hip re-revision surgery. Garcia-Rey E; Saldaña L; Garcia-Cimbrelo E Bone Joint J; 2021 Mar; 103-B(3):492-499. PubMed ID: 33641418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High early migration of the revised acetabular component is a predictor of late cup loosening: 312 cup revisions followed with radiostereometric analysis for 2-20 years. Klerken T; Mohaddes M; Nemes S; Kärrholm J Hip Int; 2015; 25(5):471-6. PubMed ID: 25952912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Study From the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):447-452. PubMed ID: 28947370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cemented polyethylene and cementless porous-coated acetabular components have similar outcomes at a mean of seven years after total hip replacement: a prospective randomised study. Angadi DS; Brown S; Crawfurd EJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1604-10. PubMed ID: 23188899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-term survival of the trabecular metal cup is similar to that of standard cups used in acetabular revision surgery. Mohaddes M; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J Acta Orthop; 2015 Feb; 86(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 25399966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years. Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and cemented polyethylene socket in total hip revision arthroplasty. Kostensalo I; Seppänen M; Virolainen P; Mokka J; Koivisto M; Mäkelä KT Scand J Surg; 2015 Dec; 104(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 25681057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Retained Acetabular Component. Adelani MA; Mall NA; Nyazee H; Clohisy JC; Barrack RL; Nunley RM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 96(12):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 24951737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of cemented acetabular component geometry on the risk of revision for instability or loosening : a study of 224,874 primary hip arthroplasties from the National Joint Registry. Divecha HM; O'Neill TW; Lunt M; Board TN Bone Joint J; 2021 Nov; 103-B(11):1669-1677. PubMed ID: 34719277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement. Maruyama M; Wakabayashi S; Ota H; Tensho K Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty]. Trč T; Stastný E Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system]. Wassilew GI; Janz V; Perka C; Müller M Orthopade; 2017 Feb; 46(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 28083681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]