These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28665903)

  • 1. Man Versus Machine: Comparing Double Data Entry and Optical Mark Recognition for Processing CAHPS Survey Data.
    Fifolt M; Blackburn J; Rhodes DJ; Gillespie S; Bennett A; Wolff P; Rucks A
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2017; 26(3):131-135. PubMed ID: 28665903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Data entry quality of double data entry vs automated form processing technologies: A cohort study validation of optical mark recognition and intelligent character recognition in a clinical setting.
    Paulsen A; Harboe K; Dalen I
    Health Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 3(4):e210. PubMed ID: 33283058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of error detection rates between the reading aloud method and the double data entry method.
    Kawado M; Hinotsu S; Matsuyama Y; Yamaguchi T; Hashimoto S; Ohashi Y
    Control Clin Trials; 2003 Oct; 24(5):560-9. PubMed ID: 14500053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data validation and other strategies for data entry.
    Kupzyk KA; Cohen MZ
    West J Nurs Res; 2015 Apr; 37(4):546-56. PubMed ID: 24782433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Epilogue: Early lessons from CAHPS Demonstrations and Evaluations. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.
    Carman KL; Short PF; Farley DO; Schnaier JA; Elliott DB; Gallagher PM
    Med Care; 1999 Mar; 37(3 Suppl):MS97-105. PubMed ID: 10098564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cost effectiveness of including pencils and erasers with self-completion epidemiological questionnaires.
    Aveyard P; Manaseki S; Griffin C
    Public Health; 2001 Jan; 115(1):80-1. PubMed ID: 11402357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extracting Medical Information from Paper COVID-19 Assessment Forms.
    White-Dzuro CG; Schultz JD; Ye C; Coco JR; Myers JM; Shackelford C; Rosenbloom ST; Fabbri D
    Appl Clin Inform; 2021 Jan; 12(1):170-178. PubMed ID: 33694142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes.
    Paulsen A; Overgaard S; Lauritsen JM
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35087. PubMed ID: 22493733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Injury severity: better data through direct physician entry of anatomic injuries?
    Cushing BM; Teitelbaum SD; Burman W; Karges D; Bame W
    Med Decis Making; 1991; 11(4 Suppl):S45-8. PubMed ID: 1770847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of Wait Times and Impact of Real-Time Surveys on Patient Satisfaction.
    Pena SM; Lawrence N
    Dermatol Surg; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1288-1291. PubMed ID: 28796658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding the determinants of patient satisfaction with surgical care using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surgical care survey (S-CAHPS).
    Schmocker RK; Cherney Stafford LM; Siy AB; Leverson GE; Winslow ER
    Surgery; 2015 Dec; 158(6):1724-33. PubMed ID: 26195107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of two systems for entering and assessing dietary data for a research study.
    Murphy SP; Martin CL; Davison N; Wang-Kit Cheung L; Au DL; Novotny R
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 May; 109(5):905-8. PubMed ID: 19394479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survey of CEOs shows future hospitals will have to fight for funding, patient loyalty to survive.
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 2004 Nov; 22(11):8-10. PubMed ID: 15631121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving OR Efficiency.
    Vassell P
    AORN J; 2016 Aug; 104(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 27472972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of smartphones to paper-based questionnaires for routine influenza sentinel surveillance, Kenya, 2011-2012.
    Njuguna HN; Caselton DL; Arunga GO; Emukule GO; Kinyanjui DK; Kalani RM; Kinkade C; Muthoka PM; Katz MA; Mott JA
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2014 Dec; 14():107. PubMed ID: 25539745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Web-Based Patient Experience Surveys to Enhance Response Rates
    Labovitz J; Patel N; Santander I
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2017 Nov; 107(6):516-521. PubMed ID: 29252022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assurance of data: ensuring that numbers reflect operational definitions and contain real measurements.
    Rieder HL; Lauritsen JM
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2011 Mar; 15(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 21333095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development and evaluation of a PDA-based method for public health surveillance data collection in developing countries.
    Yu P; de Courten M; Pan E; Galea G; Pryor J
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 Aug; 78(8):532-42. PubMed ID: 19369114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infusion alliances: benchmarking and data collection.
    Poole S
    J Infus Nurs; 2010; 33(5):310-5. PubMed ID: 20841985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated entry of hospital infection surveillance data.
    Smyth ET; McIlvenny G; Barr JG; Dickson LM; Thompson IM
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1997 Jul; 18(7):486-91. PubMed ID: 9247831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.