These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28666560)
1. Worldwide population variation in pelvic sexual dimorphism: A validation and recalibration of the Klales et al. method. Kenyhercz MW; Klales AR; Stull KE; McCormick KA; Cole SJ Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():259.e1-259.e8. PubMed ID: 28666560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recalibration of the Klales et al. (2012) method of sexing the human innominate for Mexican populations. Gómez-Valdés JA; Menéndez Garmendia A; García-Barzola L; Sánchez-Mejorada G; Karam C; Baraybar JP; Klales A Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Mar; 162(3):600-604. PubMed ID: 28117482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and Reliability of the Klales et al. (2012) Morphoscopic Pelvic Sexing Method. Lesciotto KM; Doershuk LJ J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):214-220. PubMed ID: 28382657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Secular Change in Morphological Pelvic Traits used for Sex Estimation. Klales AR J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 27404602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation and recalibration of sex estimation methods using pubic nonmetric traits for the Chilean population. Rojas González N; Obertová Z; Franklin D Int J Legal Med; 2024 Sep; 138(5):2071-2080. PubMed ID: 38613625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adapting and Applying the Phenice (1969) Adult Morphological Sex Estimation Technique to Subadults. Klales AR; Burns TL J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):747-752. PubMed ID: 28168696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nonmetric sex estimation in a contemporary Indonesian population: a validation study using clinical pelvic MSCT scans. Lye R; Obertová Z; Bachtiar NA; Franklin D Int J Legal Med; 2024 Nov; 138(6):2607-2616. PubMed ID: 38862819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A revised method of sexing the human innominate using Phenice's nonmetric traits and statistical methods. Klales AR; Ousley SD; Vollner JM Am J Phys Anthropol; 2012 Sep; 149(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 22714398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Influence of Body Size on the Expression of Sexually Dimorphic Morphological Traits. Horbaly HE; Kenyhercz MW; Hubbe M; Steadman DW J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 29975982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sex estimation of skeletons in middle and late adulthood: reliability of pelvic morphological traits and long bone metrics on an Italian skeletal collection. Selliah P; Martino F; Cummaudo M; Indra L; Biehler-Gomez L; Campobasso CP; Cattaneo C Int J Legal Med; 2020 Sep; 134(5):1683-1690. PubMed ID: 32300869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex assessment from the pelvis: a test of the Phenice (1969) and Klales et al. (2012) methods. Jager VR; Eliopoulos C Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2024 Sep; 20(3):778-784. PubMed ID: 37535230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The posterior portion of the ilium as a sex indicator: A validation study. Bonczarowska JH; Bonicelli A; Papadomanolakis A; Kranioti EF Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():216.e1-216.e6. PubMed ID: 30528515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Validation Study of the Langley et al. (2017) Decision Tree Model for Sex Estimation. Garvin HM; Klales AR J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1243-1251. PubMed ID: 29148064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Population-specificity of sexual dimorphism in cranial and pelvic traits: evaluation of existing and proposal of new functions for sex assessment in a Greek assemblage. Oikonomopoulou EK; Valakos E; Nikita E Int J Legal Med; 2017 Nov; 131(6):1731-1738. PubMed ID: 28770382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracies of discriminant function equations for sex estimation using long bones of upper extremities. Bidmos MA; Mazengenya P Int J Legal Med; 2021 May; 135(3):1095-1102. PubMed ID: 33179172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of 3D virtual bone models of the pelvis for morphological sex estimation. Colman KL; van der Merwe AE; Stull KE; Dobbe JGG; Streekstra GJ; van Rijn RR; Oostra RJ; de Boer HH Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1853-1860. PubMed ID: 30680527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing the cross-applicability of juvenile sex estimation from diaphyseal dimensions. Lamer M; Spake L; Cardoso HFV Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 321():110739. PubMed ID: 33662898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osteometric sex estimation from the os coxa in a Thai population. Mahakkanukrauh P; Ruengdit S; Tun SM; Case DT; Sinthubua A Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():127.e1-127.e7. PubMed ID: 28062152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osteometric sex determination from the pelvis--does population specificity matter? Steyn M; Patriquin ML Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Oct; 191(1-3):113.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19665855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]