192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28666560)
1. Worldwide population variation in pelvic sexual dimorphism: A validation and recalibration of the Klales et al. method.
Kenyhercz MW; Klales AR; Stull KE; McCormick KA; Cole SJ
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():259.e1-259.e8. PubMed ID: 28666560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recalibration of the Klales et al. (2012) method of sexing the human innominate for Mexican populations.
Gómez-Valdés JA; Menéndez Garmendia A; García-Barzola L; Sánchez-Mejorada G; Karam C; Baraybar JP; Klales A
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Mar; 162(3):600-604. PubMed ID: 28117482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and Reliability of the Klales et al. (2012) Morphoscopic Pelvic Sexing Method.
Lesciotto KM; Doershuk LJ
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):214-220. PubMed ID: 28382657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Secular Change in Morphological Pelvic Traits used for Sex Estimation.
Klales AR
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 27404602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving Nonmetric Sex Classification for Hispanic Individuals.
Klales AR; Cole SJ
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):975-980. PubMed ID: 28070893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adapting and Applying the Phenice (1969) Adult Morphological Sex Estimation Technique to Subadults.
Klales AR; Burns TL
J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):747-752. PubMed ID: 28168696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A revised method of sexing the human innominate using Phenice's nonmetric traits and statistical methods.
Klales AR; Ousley SD; Vollner JM
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2012 Sep; 149(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 22714398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation and recalibration of sex estimation methods using pubic nonmetric traits for the Chilean population.
Rojas González N; Obertová Z; Franklin D
Int J Legal Med; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38613625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Influence of Body Size on the Expression of Sexually Dimorphic Morphological Traits.
Horbaly HE; Kenyhercz MW; Hubbe M; Steadman DW
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 29975982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonmetric sex estimation in a contemporary Indonesian population: a validation study using clinical pelvic MSCT scans.
Lye R; Obertová Z; Bachtiar NA; Franklin D
Int J Legal Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38862819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sex estimation of skeletons in middle and late adulthood: reliability of pelvic morphological traits and long bone metrics on an Italian skeletal collection.
Selliah P; Martino F; Cummaudo M; Indra L; Biehler-Gomez L; Campobasso CP; Cattaneo C
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Sep; 134(5):1683-1690. PubMed ID: 32300869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex assessment from the pelvis: a test of the Phenice (1969) and Klales et al. (2012) methods.
Jager VR; Eliopoulos C
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37535230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The posterior portion of the ilium as a sex indicator: A validation study.
Bonczarowska JH; Bonicelli A; Papadomanolakis A; Kranioti EF
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():216.e1-216.e6. PubMed ID: 30528515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Validation Study of the Langley et al. (2017) Decision Tree Model for Sex Estimation.
Garvin HM; Klales AR
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1243-1251. PubMed ID: 29148064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Population-specificity of sexual dimorphism in cranial and pelvic traits: evaluation of existing and proposal of new functions for sex assessment in a Greek assemblage.
Oikonomopoulou EK; Valakos E; Nikita E
Int J Legal Med; 2017 Nov; 131(6):1731-1738. PubMed ID: 28770382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracies of discriminant function equations for sex estimation using long bones of upper extremities.
Bidmos MA; Mazengenya P
Int J Legal Med; 2021 May; 135(3):1095-1102. PubMed ID: 33179172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of 3D virtual bone models of the pelvis for morphological sex estimation.
Colman KL; van der Merwe AE; Stull KE; Dobbe JGG; Streekstra GJ; van Rijn RR; Oostra RJ; de Boer HH
Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1853-1860. PubMed ID: 30680527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing the cross-applicability of juvenile sex estimation from diaphyseal dimensions.
Lamer M; Spake L; Cardoso HFV
Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 321():110739. PubMed ID: 33662898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osteometric sex estimation from the os coxa in a Thai population.
Mahakkanukrauh P; Ruengdit S; Tun SM; Case DT; Sinthubua A
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():127.e1-127.e7. PubMed ID: 28062152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osteometric sex determination from the pelvis--does population specificity matter?
Steyn M; Patriquin ML
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Oct; 191(1-3):113.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19665855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
