BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28666693)

  • 1. Effect of severity of illness on cesarean delivery rates in Washington State.
    Hitti J; Walker S; Benedetti TJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):474.e1-474.e5. PubMed ID: 28666693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.
    Sebastião YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States.
    Little SE; Orav EJ; Robinson JN; Caughey AB; Jha AK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 214(6):735.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26721777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing hospital differences in low-risk cesarean delivery metrics in Florida.
    Obure R; Reid CN; Salemi JL; Rubio E; Louis J; Sappenfield WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):684.e1-684.e9. PubMed ID: 37321284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association between vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and primary cesarean delivery rates.
    Rosenstein MG; Kuppermann M; Gregorich SE; Cottrell EK; Caughey AB; Cheng YW
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 122(5):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 24104780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduction in Cesarean Delivery Rates Associated With a State Quality Collaborative in Maryland.
    Callaghan-Koru JA; DiPietro B; Wahid I; Mark K; Burke AB; Curran G; Creanga AA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 138(4):583-592. PubMed ID: 34623072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hospital-level variation in racial disparities in low-risk nulliparous cesarean delivery rates.
    Main EK; Chang SC; Tucker CM; Sakowski C; Leonard SA; Rosenstein MG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Dec; 5(12):101145. PubMed ID: 37648109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variation in the Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Cesarean Delivery Rate.
    Pasko DN; McGee P; Grobman WA; Bailit JL; Reddy UM; Wapner RJ; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Leveno KJ; Caritis SN; Prasad M; Saade G; Sorokin Y; Rouse DJ; Blackwell SC; Tolosa JE;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 131(6):1039-1048. PubMed ID: 29742665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital Quality Improvement Interventions, Statewide Policy Initiatives, and Rates of Cesarean Delivery for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Births in California.
    Rosenstein MG; Chang SC; Sakowski C; Markow C; Teleki S; Lang L; Logan J; Cape V; Main EK
    JAMA; 2021 Apr; 325(16):1631-1639. PubMed ID: 33904868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Cesarean Rates for Term, Singleton, Live Vertex Deliveries in China in 2020 Among Women With No Prior Cesarean Delivery.
    Yin S; Chen L; Zhou Y; Yuan P; Guo X; Lu J; Ge L; Shi H; Wang X; Li L; Qiao J; Zhao Y; Qi H; Ma X; Wei Y
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e234521. PubMed ID: 36951859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hospital-Level Variation in the Frequency of Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Who Undergo Labor Induction.
    Main EK; Chang SC; Cheng YW; Rosenstein MG; Lagrew DC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1179-1189. PubMed ID: 33156193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Racial Disparities in Cesarean Delivery Rates: Do Hospital-Level Factors Matter?
    Nicole Teal E; Baer RJ; Jelliffe-Pawlowski L; Mengesha B
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 Mar; 41(4):375-382. PubMed ID: 37913783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association between hospital-level cesarean delivery rates and severe maternal morbidity and unexpected newborn complications.
    Clapp MA; James KE; Little SE; Robinson JN; Kaimal AJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Nov; 3(6):100474. PubMed ID: 34481997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety Assessment of a Large-Scale Improvement Collaborative to Reduce Nulliparous Cesarean Delivery Rates.
    Main EK; Chang SC; Cape V; Sakowski C; Smith H; Vasher J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):613-623. PubMed ID: 30870288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Institutional prevalence of class III obesity modifies risk of adverse obstetrical outcomes.
    Katz Eriksen JL; Souter VL; Napolitano PG; Chandrasekaran S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2020 Feb; 2(1):100058. PubMed ID: 33345993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates: institutional and individual level predictors.
    Coonrod DV; Drachman D; Hobson P; Manriquez M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):694.e1-11; discussion 694.e11. PubMed ID: 18538157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in primary cesarean delivery rates by individual physician within a single-hospital laborist model.
    Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Gilbert SAB; Doyle R; Tong A; Carey JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):531.e1-531.e6. PubMed ID: 26922481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State.
    McKenzie L; Stephenson PA
    Am J Public Health; 1993 Aug; 83(8):1109-12. PubMed ID: 8342718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do provider birth attitudes influence cesarean delivery rate: a cross-sectional study.
    White VanGompel E; Main EK; Tancredi D; Melnikow J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):184. PubMed ID: 29843622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hospital-Level Factors Associated with Anesthesia-Related Adverse Events in Cesarean Deliveries, New York State, 2009-2011.
    Guglielminotti J; Deneux-Tharaux C; Wong CA; Li G
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Jun; 122(6):1947-56. PubMed ID: 27195637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.