These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28669102)

  • 1. Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature.
    Cavagnaro L; Formica M; Basso M; Zanirato A; Divano S; Felli L
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2018 Apr; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28669102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
    Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.
    Tanzer M; Graves SE; Peng A; Shimmin AJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 29683803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cementless lateralized stems in primary THA: Mid-term survival and risk factors for failure in 172 stems.
    Courtin C; Viste A; Subtil F; Cantin O; Desmarchelier R; Fessy MH
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 103(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 27914976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Role for Modern Primary Cementless Femoral Stems in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.
    Skibicki HE; Post ZD; Kay AB; Czymek MM; Ong AC; Orozco FR; Ponzio DY
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Sep; 36(9):3269-3274. PubMed ID: 34053749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.
    Sandiford NA; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):186-192. PubMed ID: 27672012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Contemporary Triple-Tapered Titanium Stem.
    Carlson SW; Goetz DD; Liu SS; Greiner JJ; Callaghan JJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2231-6. PubMed ID: 27339824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Not all cementless femoral stems are created equal but the results may be comparable.
    Carlson SW; Liu SS; Callaghan JJ
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(1 Supple A):14-17. PubMed ID: 28042113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral revision with a primary cementless stem.
    Gastaud O; Cambas PM; Tabutin J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 102(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 26874449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do Stem Design and Surgical Approach Influence Early Aseptic Loosening in Cementless THA?
    Janssen L; Wijnands KAP; Janssen D; Janssen MWHE; Morrenhof JW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1212-1220. PubMed ID: 29481346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term survivorship of the Corail™ standard stem.
    Louboutin L; Viste A; Desmarchelier R; Fessy MH
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Nov; 103(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 28778624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision total hip arthroplasty by nonmodular short and long cementless stems.
    Kimura H; Kaneuji A; Sugimori T; Matsumoto T
    J Orthop Sci; 2008 Jul; 13(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 18696192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Sep; 474(9):2008-17. PubMed ID: 27260482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tapered stems one-third proximally coated have higher complication rates than cylindrical two-third coated stems in patients with high hip dislocation undergoing total hip arthroplasty with step-cut shortening osteotomy.
    Ozden VE; Dikmen G; Beksac B; Tozun IR
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 103(4):569-577. PubMed ID: 28300706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular cementless femoral stem.
    Pelt CE; Madsen W; Erickson JA; Gililland JM; Anderson MB; Peters CL
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1803-7. PubMed ID: 24929283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cortical Strut Allograft Support of Modular Femoral Junctions During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Lim CT; Amanatullah DF; Huddleston JI; Hwang KL; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1586-1592. PubMed ID: 28130016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-Term Survival of Retained Cementless Hip Stems at an Average of 13 Years After Isolated Cup Revision.
    Innmann MM; Peitgen DS; Merle C; Bruckner T; Gotterbarm T; Moradi B; Streit MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Feb; 101(3):265-269. PubMed ID: 30730486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term outcomes of cementless femoral stem revision with the Wagner cone prosthesis.
    Park KS; Jin SY; Lim JH; Yoon TR
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Jun; 16(1):375. PubMed ID: 34116695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.