191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28669111)
1. Iopamidol as an oral contrast media for computed tomography: a taste comparison to iohexol, diatrizoate sodium, and barium sulfate.
Rogers D; Sheth C; Eisenmenger L; Mignogna E; Winter T
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2822-2826. PubMed ID: 28669111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptability of oral iodinated contrast media: a head-to-head comparison of four media.
Pollentine A; Ngan-Soo E; McCoubrie P
Br J Radiol; 2013 May; 86(1025):20120636. PubMed ID: 23564884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oral contrast media for body CT: Comparison of diatrizoate sodium and iohexol for patient acceptance and bowel opacification.
McNamara MM; Lockhart ME; Fineberg NS; Berland LL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 20966319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of intravenous contrast agents for CT studies in children.
Cohen MD; Herman E; Herron D; White SJ; Smith JA
Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):592-5. PubMed ID: 1449887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. A double-blind randomized study comparing an aqueous solution of amidotrizoate, an aqueous solution of iohexol and a viscous solution of iohexol.
Lönnemark M; Magnusson A; Ahlström H
Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 8369192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative investigation of i.v. iohexol and iopamidol: effect on renal function in low-risk outpatients undergoing CT.
Dillman JR; al-Hawary M; Ellis JH; Cohan RH; Kaza R; Myles JD; Khalatbari S; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):392-7. PubMed ID: 22268183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oral contrast agents for CT: a taste test survey.
Quagliano PV; Austin RF
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):720-2. PubMed ID: 9294558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of iopamidol and iohexol in rat lungs following experimental aspiration.
D'Agostino HR; Liebig RJ; McGovern M; Weinshelbaum A; Reich SB
Invest Radiol; 1989 Nov; 24(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 2807806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Small-bowel angioedema during screening computed tomography due to intravenous contrast material.
Park SW; Bae IY; Eun HW; Park HW; Choe JW
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):549-52. PubMed ID: 21926847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of barium and diatrizoate bowel labelling agents in computed tomography.
Carr DH; Banks LM
Br J Radiol; 1985 May; 58(689):393-4. PubMed ID: 4063689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of "Gastromiro" for bowel opacification during computed tomography: comparison with diatrizoate and barium sulphate.
Doyle GJ; O'Donnell SC; McDonald JR; Murthy LN; Keir MJ; Wright AR
Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):681-4. PubMed ID: 7719680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Two Neutral Oral Contrast Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study.
Dillman JR; Towbin AJ; Imbus R; Young J; Gates E; Trout AT
Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):245-251. PubMed ID: 29737955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flow properties of oral contrast medium formulations depend on the temperature.
Ekberg O; Stading M; Johansson D; Bülow M; Ekman S; Wendin K
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 20380600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective and Subjective Intrapatient Comparison of Iohexol Versus Diatrizoate for Bowel Preparation Quality at CT Colonography.
Johnson B; Hinshaw JL; Robbins JB; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1202-7. PubMed ID: 27010251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. E-Z-CAT. An oral contrast medium for use in computed tomography of the abdomen.
Nyman U; Dinnetz G; Andersson I
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 6731015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of iohexol as oral contrast for computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis.
Horton KM; Fishman EK; Gayler B
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(2):207-9. PubMed ID: 18379303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Gastromiro vs gastrografin vs prontobario CAT for computerized tomography. Multicenter study].
Rollandi GA; Curone PF; Pastorino C; Fanti B; Martinoli C; Bonati F; Montesi A; Fabrizzi GC; Dini L; Pesaresi A
Radiol Med; 1991 Sep; 82(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 1947265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
Koo CW; Shah-Patel LR; Baer JW; Frager DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
