1460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28669280)
1. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic Performance of Different Lymph Node Staging Systems After Curative Intent Resection for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.
Spolverato G; Ejaz A; Kim Y; Squires MH; Poultsides G; Fields RC; Bloomston M; Weber SM; Votanopoulos K; Acher AW; Jin LX; Hawkins WG; Schmidt C; Kooby DA; Worhunsky D; Saunders N; Cho CS; Levine EA; Maithel SK; Pawlik TM
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):991-8. PubMed ID: 25563867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic value of three different lymph node staging systems in the survival of patients with gastric cancer following D2 lymphadenectomy.
Jian-Hui C; Shi-Rong C; Hui W; Si-le C; Jian-Bo X; Er-Tao Z; Chuang-Qi C; Yu-Long H
Tumour Biol; 2016 Aug; 37(8):11105-13. PubMed ID: 26912060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What is the most accurate lymph node staging method for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? Comparison of UICC/AJCC pN stage, number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes.
Conci S; Ruzzenente A; Sandri M; Bertuzzo F; Campagnaro T; Bagante F; Capelli P; D'Onofrio M; Piccino M; Dorna AE; Pedrazzani C; Iacono C; Guglielmi A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):743-750. PubMed ID: 28094085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS): what are their role in the prognostic assessment of gastric adenocarcinoma?
Aurello P; Petrucciani N; Nigri GR; La Torre M; Magistri P; Tierno S; D'Angelo F; Ramacciato G
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Jul; 18(7):1254-60. PubMed ID: 24841441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
Alatengbaolide ; Lin D; Li Y; Xu H; Chen J; Wang B; Liu C; Lu P
Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 22547011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis.
Pan S; Wang P; Xing Y; Li K; Wang Z; Xu H; Zhu Z
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2019 Sep; 39(1):49. PubMed ID: 31519217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Superiority of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) for prognostic prediction after gastric cancer surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of 7620 patients in China.
Gu P; Deng J; Sun Z; Wang Z; Wang W; Liang H; Xu H; Zhou Z
Surg Today; 2021 Jan; 51(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 32754844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognosis for gastric carcinomas with an insufficient number of examined negative lymph nodes.
Martinez-Ramos D; Calero A; Escrig-Sos J; Mingol F; Daroca-Jose JM; Sauri M; Arroyo A; Salvador-Sanchis JL; de Juan M; Calpena R; Lacueva FJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 24075824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio: the lymph node ratio could be a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer.
Hou Y; Wang X; Chen J
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 16(1):198. PubMed ID: 30286762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of five competing lymph node staging schemes in a cohort of resectable gastric cancer patients.
Smith DD; Nelson RA; Schwarz RE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):875-82. PubMed ID: 24242677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Defining an Optimal Prognostic Lymph Node Stratification Schema.
Kim Y; Spolverato G; Amini N; Margonis GA; Gupta R; Ejaz A; Pawlik TM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 22(8):2772-8. PubMed ID: 25663595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic relevance of lymph node status for patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma after radical resection followed by adjuvant treatment.
Kwon J; Kim K; Chie EK; Kim BH; Jang JY; Kim SW; Oh DY; Bang YJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1690-1696. PubMed ID: 28648977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The assessment of the optimal number of examined lymph nodes and prognostic models based on lymph nodes for predicting survival outcome in patients with stage N3b gastric cancer.
Guo S; Shang M; Dong Z; Zhang J; Wang Y; Zhao Y
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2021 Apr; 17(2):e117-e124. PubMed ID: 32762113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor for gastric cancer.
Nelen SD; van Steenbergen LN; Dassen AE; van der Wurff AA; Lemmens VE; Bosscha K
Acta Oncol; 2013 Nov; 52(8):1751-9. PubMed ID: 23317142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The RML of lymph node metastasis was superior to the LODDS for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer.
Liu H; Deng J; Zhang R; Hao X; Jiao X; Liang H
Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 23541652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of three lymph node classifications for survival prediction in distant metastatic gastric cancer.
Zhou R; Zhang J; Sun H; Liao Y; Liao W
Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():165-171. PubMed ID: 27713088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ratio and log odds of positive lymph nodes in breast cancer patients with mastectomy.
Chen LJ; Chung KP; Chang YJ; Chang YJ
Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 26055316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of different lymph node staging schemes in prostate cancer patients with lymph node metastasis.
Jin S; Wang J; Shen Y; Gan H; Xu P; Wei Y; Wei J; Wu J; Wang B; Wang J; Yang C; Zhu Y; Ye D
Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Jan; 52(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 31552575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic Implications of Lymph Node Status for Patients With Gallbladder Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study.
Amini N; Kim Y; Wilson A; Margonis GA; Ethun CG; Poultsides G; Tran T; Idrees K; Isom CA; Fields RC; Krasnick B; Weber SM; Salem A; Martin RC; Scoggins C; Shen P; Mogal HD; Schmidt C; Beal E; Hatzaras I; Shenoy R; Maithel SK; Pawlik TM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):3016-23. PubMed ID: 27150440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
