167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28670135)
21. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.
Kaicker J; Borg Debono V; Dang W; Buckley N; Thabane L
BMC Med; 2010 Oct; 8():59. PubMed ID: 20939875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessing and Improving the Effectiveness of Online Patient Education Materials on Essential Vocal Tremor: A Comprehensive Evaluation.
Ho B; Hong EM; Benson BE
J Voice; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38493016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
Özduran E; Hanci V
Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.
Aboalshamat K
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):797. PubMed ID: 37880640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.
Chi E; Jabbour N; Aaronson NL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():1-3. PubMed ID: 28583484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the quality of information online for arthroscopic Bankart repair.
Shazil Jamal M; Hurley ET; Davey MS; Asad H; Gaafar M; Mullett H
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 May; 105(5):394-399. PubMed ID: 35639042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quality of Web-based Information for the 10 Most Common Fractures.
Memon M; Ginsberg L; Simunovic N; Ristevski B; Bhandari M; Kleinlugtenbelt YV
Interact J Med Res; 2016 Jun; 5(2):e19. PubMed ID: 27317159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Readability and quality of online eating disorder information-Are they sufficient? A systematic review evaluating websites on anorexia nervosa using DISCERN and Flesch Readability.
Arts H; Lemetyinen H; Edge D
Int J Eat Disord; 2020 Jan; 53(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 31589331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on COVID-19: an infodemiological study.
Halboub E; Al-Ak'hali MS; Al-Mekhlafi HM; Alhajj MN
BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 33461516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet.
Azer SA; AlOlayan TI; AlGhamdi MA; AlSanea MA
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 23(9):1676-1696. PubMed ID: 28321169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Availability of accessible and high-quality information on the Internet for patients regarding the diagnosis and management of rotator cuff tears.
Dalton DM; Kelly EG; Molony DC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 May; 24(5):e135-40. PubMed ID: 25457189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality, Readability, and Trends for Websites on Ankyloglossia.
Aaronson NL; Castaño JE; Simons JP; Jabbour N
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Jul; 127(7):439-444. PubMed ID: 29774762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Does Google™ Have the Answers? The Internet-based Information on Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures.
Murphy EP; Fenelon C; Murphy F; Baig MN; Murphy RP; Diack M; Leonard M
Cureus; 2019 Oct; 11(10):e5952. PubMed ID: 31799093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Readability and quality assessment of websites related to microtia and aural atresia.
Alamoudi U; Hong P
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 79(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 25554575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An objective analysis of quality and readability of online information on COVID-19.
Wrigley Kelly NE; Murray KE; McCarthy C; O'Shea DB
Health Technol (Berl); 2021; 11(5):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 34189011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
