These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28670406)

  • 1. The Effect of Soft and Rigid Cervical Collars on Head and Neck Immobilization in Healthy Subjects.
    Barati K; Arazpour M; Vameghi R; Abdoli A; Farmani F
    Asian Spine J; 2017 Jun; 11(3):390-395. PubMed ID: 28670406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical immobilization in trauma patients: soft collars better than rigid collars? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bäcker HC; Elias P; Braun KF; Johnson MA; Turner P; Cunningham J
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Dec; 31(12):3378-3391. PubMed ID: 36181555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
    Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motion generated in the unstable cervical spine during the application and removal of cervical immobilization collars.
    Prasarn ML; Conrad B; Del Rossi G; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Jun; 72(6):1609-13. PubMed ID: 22695429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of cervical motion restriction and interface pressure between two cervical collars.
    Araghi K; Jacofsky M; McCamley J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Oct; 89():105482. PubMed ID: 34537462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the Nebraska collar, a new prototype cervical immobilization collar, with three standard models.
    Alberts LR; Mahoney CR; Neff JR
    J Orthop Trauma; 1998 Aug; 12(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 9715451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of extrication collars tested during the execution of spine-board transfer techniques.
    Del Rossi G; Heffernan TP; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6):619-23. PubMed ID: 15541692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion During Application Among 4 Rigid Immobilization Collars.
    James CY; Riemann BL; Munkasy BA; Joyner AB
    J Athl Train; 2004 Jun; 39(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 15173864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two new immobilization collars.
    Rosen PB; McSwain NE; Arata M; Stahl S; Mercer D
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1189-95. PubMed ID: 1416295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of a soft collar, used as normally recommended or reversed, on three planes of cervical range of motion.
    Carter VM; Fasen JA; Roman JM; Hayes KW; Petersen CM
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1996 Mar; 23(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 8919400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical spine stabilization in pediatric patients: evaluation of current techniques.
    Huerta C; Griffith R; Joyce SM
    Ann Emerg Med; 1987 Oct; 16(10):1121-6. PubMed ID: 3662157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kinematic evaluation of 4 pediatric collars and distribution of cervical movement between primary and coupled angles.
    Assi A; Yazbeck P; Massaad A; Skalli W; Ghanem I
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2014; 34(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 24322631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of various cervical orthoses. An in vivo comparison of the mechanical stability provided by several widely used models.
    Sandler AJ; Dvorak J; Humke T; Grob D; Daniels W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(14):1624-9. PubMed ID: 8839463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of neck movement in the soft cervical collar and rigid cervical brace in healthy subjects.
    Whitcroft KL; Massouh L; Amirfeyz R; Bannister GC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2011 Feb; 34(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 21334544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The position of the head during treatment in the emergency room-an explorative analysis of immobilization of the cervical spine].
    Jung MK; Uzun DD; von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt GVR; Grützner PA; Kreinest M
    Anaesthesist; 2021 Nov; 70(11):922-927. PubMed ID: 33909105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of efficacy and 3D kinematic characteristics of cervical orthoses.
    Zhang S; Wortley M; Clowers K; Krusenklaus JH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Mar; 20(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 15698698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Range-of-motion restriction and craniofacial tissue-interface pressure from four cervical collars.
    Tescher AN; Rindflesch AB; Youdas JW; Jacobson TM; Downer LL; Miers AG; Basford JR; Cullinane DC; Stevens SR; Pankratz VS; Decker PA
    J Trauma; 2007 Nov; 63(5):1120-6. PubMed ID: 17993960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of remaining motion using one innovative upper airway opening cervical collar and two traditional cervical collars.
    Jung MK; von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt GVR; Keil H; Grützner PA; Schneider NRE; Kreinest M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20619. PubMed ID: 34663847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating a novel, low-cost technique for cervical-spine immobilization for application in resource-limited LMICs: a non-inferiority trial.
    Eisner ZJ; Delaney PG; Pine H; Yeh K; Aleem IS; Raghavendran K; Widder P
    Spinal Cord; 2022 Aug; 60(8):726-732. PubMed ID: 35194169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.