701 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28671290)
21. Estimating chemical ecotoxicity in EU ecolabel and in EU product environmental footprint.
Saouter E; De Schryver A; Pant R; Sala S
Environ Int; 2018 Sep; 118():44-47. PubMed ID: 29793115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A quantitative screening-level approach to incorporate chemical exposure and risk into alternative assessment evaluations.
Arnold SM; Greggs B; Goyak KO; Landenberger BD; Mason AM; Howard B; Zaleski RT
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1007-1022. PubMed ID: 28294522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. SPERCS-A tool for environmental emission estimation.
Reihlen A; Bahr T; Bögi C; Dobe C; May T; Verdonck F; Wind T; Zullo L; Tolls J
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Oct; 12(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 26639451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the Chronic Toxicity of Nickel to Temperate and Tropical Freshwater Species.
Peters A; Merrington G; Leverett D; Wilson I; Schlekat C; Garman E
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Jun; 38(6):1211-1220. PubMed ID: 30714193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Toward harmonizing ecotoxicity characterization in life cycle impact assessment.
Fantke P; Aurisano N; Bare J; Backhaus T; Bulle C; Chapman PM; De Zwart D; Dwyer R; Ernstoff A; Golsteijn L; Holmquist H; Jolliet O; McKone TE; Owsianiak M; Peijnenburg W; Posthuma L; Roos S; Saouter E; Schowanek D; van Straalen NM; Vijver MG; Hauschild M
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Dec; 37(12):2955-2971. PubMed ID: 30178491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Screening-Level Estimates of Environmental Release Rates, Predicted Exposures, and Toxic Pressures of Currently Used Chemicals.
van de Meent D; de Zwart D; Posthuma L
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1839-1851. PubMed ID: 32539202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Exposure and Toxicity Characterization of Chemical Emissions and Chemicals in Products: Global Recommendations and Implementation in USEtox.
Fantke P; Chiu WA; Aylward L; Judson R; Huang L; Jang S; Gouin T; Rhomberg L; Aurisano N; McKone T; Jolliet O
Int J Life Cycle Assess; 2021 May; 26(5):899-915. PubMed ID: 34140756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The potential ecotoxicological impact of pharmaceutical and personal care products on humans and freshwater, based on USEtox™ characterization factors. A Spanish case study of toxicity impact scores.
Ortiz de García S; García-Encina PA; Irusta-Mata R
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():429-445. PubMed ID: 28755593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ranking of concern, based on environmental indexes, for pharmaceutical and personal care products: an application to the Spanish case.
Ortiz de García S; Pinto GP; García-Encina PA; Irusta Mata RI
J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():384-97. PubMed ID: 23995140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Environmental Risk Assessment of Technical Mixtures Under the European Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals-A Regulatory Perspective.
Galert W; Hassold E
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 May; 17(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 33448633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ecotoxicological hazard and risk assessment of endocrine active substances.
Leopold A; Roberts M; Matthiessen P
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):264-266. PubMed ID: 27862919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Advancing exposure characterization for chemical evaluation and risk assessment.
Cohen Hubal EA; Richard A; Aylward L; Edwards S; Gallagher J; Goldsmith MR; Isukapalli S; Tornero-Velez R; Weber E; Kavlock R
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):299-313. PubMed ID: 20574904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Application of chemical toxicity distributions to ecotoxicology data requirements under REACH.
Williams ES; Berninger JP; Brooks BW
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Aug; 30(8):1943-54. PubMed ID: 21590796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Making fate and exposure models for freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle assessment suitable for organic acids and bases.
van Zelm R; Stam G; Huijbregts MA; van de Meent D
Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(2):312-7. PubMed ID: 22884491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessing the relevance of ecotoxicological studies for regulatory decision making.
Rudén C; Adams J; Ågerstrand M; Brock TC; Poulsen V; Schlekat CE; Wheeler JR; Henry TR
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):652-663. PubMed ID: 27599457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Developing Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) for shampoos: The basis for comparable life cycle assessment.
Golsteijn L; Lessard L; Campion JF; Capelli A; D'Enfert V; King H; Kremer J; Krugman M; Orliac H; Furnemont SR; Schuh W; Stalmans M; O'Hanlon NW; Coroama M
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Sep; 14(5):649-659. PubMed ID: 29870121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Geographical scenario uncertainty in generic fate and exposure factors of toxic pollutants for life-cycle impact assessment.
Huijbregts MA; Lundi S; McKone TE; van de Meent D
Chemosphere; 2003 May; 51(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 12615102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reliable and representative in silico predictions of freshwater ecotoxicological hazardous concentrations.
Douziech M; Ragas AMJ; van Zelm R; Oldenkamp R; Jan Hendriks A; King H; Oktivaningrum R; Huijbregts MAJ
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105334. PubMed ID: 31760260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can Chemical Toxicity in Saltwater Be Predicted from Toxicity in Freshwater? A Comprehensive Evaluation Using Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Yanagihara M; Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Aug; 41(8):2021-2027. PubMed ID: 35502940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Research Priorities for the Environmental Risk Assessment of Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances.
Gkika IS; Xie G; van Gestel CAM; Ter Laak TL; Vonk JA; van Wezel AP; Kraak MHS
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2023 Nov; 42(11):2302-2316. PubMed ID: 37589402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
