These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28673033)
1. Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for comprehensive assessment of 16S rRNA bacterial diversity in marine biofilms using high-throughput sequencing. Corcoll N; Österlund T; Sinclair L; Eiler A; Kristiansson E; Backhaus T; Eriksson KM FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2017 Aug; 364(14):. PubMed ID: 28673033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of DNA extraction for advancing coral microbiota investigations. Weber L; DeForce E; Apprill A Microbiome; 2017 Feb; 5(1):18. PubMed ID: 28179023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter? Angebault C; Payen M; Woerther PL; Rodriguez C; Botterel F PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232215. PubMed ID: 32343737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA extraction for streamlined metagenomics of diverse environmental samples. Marotz C; Amir A; Humphrey G; Gaffney J; Gogul G; Knight R Biotechniques; 2017 Jun; 62(6):290-293. PubMed ID: 28625159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies. Mattei V; Murugesan S; Al Hashmi M; Mathew R; James N; Singh P; Kumar M; Lakshmanan AP; Terranegra A; Al Khodor S; Tomei S Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():197. PubMed ID: 31245304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies. Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Host DNA depletion efficiency of microbiome DNA enrichment methods in infected tissue samples. Heravi FS; Zakrzewski M; Vickery K; Hu H J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Mar; 170():105856. PubMed ID: 32007505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of metagenomic DNA extraction procedures on the identifiable endophytic bacterial diversity in Sorghum bicolor (L. Moench). Maropola MK; Ramond JB; Trindade M J Microbiol Methods; 2015 May; 112():104-17. PubMed ID: 25775938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "MINES" method for genomic DNA extraction from deep biosphere biofilms. Govil T; Sharma W; Chauhan NK; Kumar S; Salem DR; Sani RK J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Dec; 167():105730. PubMed ID: 31676422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diversity of microbiota associated with symptomatic and non-symptomatic bacterial wilt-diseased banana plants determined using 16S rRNA metagenome sequencing. Suhaimi NSM; Goh SY; Ajam N; Othman RY; Chan KG; Thong KL World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Aug; 33(9):168. PubMed ID: 28828756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Choice of DNA extraction method affects detection of bacterial taxa from retail chicken breast. Flint A; Laidlaw A; Li L; Raitt C; Rao M; Cooper A; Weedmark K; Carrillo C; Tamber S BMC Microbiol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):230. PubMed ID: 36180850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biases from different DNA extraction methods in intestine microbiome research based on 16S rDNA sequencing: a case in the koi carp, Cyprinus carpio var. Koi. Han Z; Sun J; Lv A; Wang A Microbiologyopen; 2019 Jan; 8(1):e00626. PubMed ID: 29667371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A low-cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling. Bollmann-Giolai A; Giolai M; Heavens D; Macaulay I; Malone J; Clark MD Microbiologyopen; 2020 Dec; 9(12):e1133. PubMed ID: 33225533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel ultra high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing library preparation method for the Illumina HiSeq platform. de Muinck EJ; Trosvik P; Gilfillan GD; Hov JR; Sundaram AYM Microbiome; 2017 Jul; 5(1):68. PubMed ID: 28683838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Biases on community structure during DNA extraction of shrimp intestinal microbiota revealed by high-throughput sequencing]. Wen C; He Y; Xue M; Liang H; Dong J Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2016 Jan; 56(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 27305787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities. Vesty A; Biswas K; Taylor MW; Gear K; Douglas RG PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169877. PubMed ID: 28099455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diversity of ribosomal 16S DNA- and RNA-based bacterial community in an office building drinking water system. Inkinen J; Jayaprakash B; Santo Domingo JW; Keinänen-Toivola MM; Ryu H; Pitkänen T J Appl Microbiol; 2016 Jun; 120(6):1723-38. PubMed ID: 27009775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Large-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16S amplicon and shotgun sequencing. Tessler M; Neumann JS; Afshinnekoo E; Pineda M; Hersch R; Velho LFM; Segovia BT; Lansac-Toha FA; Lemke M; DeSalle R; Mason CE; Brugler MR Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6589. PubMed ID: 28761145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the impact of water treatment on bacterial biofilms in drinking water distribution systems using high-throughput DNA sequencing. Shaw JL; Monis P; Fabris R; Ho L; Braun K; Drikas M; Cooper A Chemosphere; 2014 Dec; 117():185-92. PubMed ID: 25038469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]