These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28673448)

  • 1. Renovascular CT: comparison between adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction.
    Noda Y; Goshima S; Koyasu H; Shigeyama S; Miyoshi T; Kawada H; Kawai N; Matsuo M
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):901.e13-901.e19. PubMed ID: 28673448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
    Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum.
    Olcott EW; Shin LK; Sommer G; Chan I; Rosenberg J; Molvin FL; Boas FE; Fleischmann D
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Right adrenal vein: comparison between adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction.
    Noda Y; Goshima S; Nagata S; Miyoshi T; Kawada H; Kawai N; Tanahashi Y; Matsuo M
    Clin Radiol; 2018 Jun; 73(6):594.e1-594.e6. PubMed ID: 29459139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Lin XZ; Machida H; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Ueno E; Chen KM; Yan FH
    Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 24496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp.
    Kim JH; Choo KS; Moon TY; Lee JW; Jeon UB; Kim TU; Hwang JY; Yun MJ; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2055-63. PubMed ID: 26486938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance evaluation of two iterative reconstruction algorithms, MBIR and ASIR, in low radiation dose and low contrast dose abdominal CT in children.
    Sun J; Yang L; Zhou Z; Zhang D; Han W; Zhang Q; Peng Y
    Radiol Med; 2020 Oct; 125(10):918-925. PubMed ID: 32319005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Son SS; Choo KS; Jeon UB; Jeon GR; Nam KJ; Kim TU; Yeom JA; Hwang JY; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 25414055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of a full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in 80 kVp ultra-low-dose paranasal sinus CT imaging of pediatric patients.
    Sun J; Zhang Q; Duan X; Zhang C; Wang P; Jia C; Liu Y; Peng Y
    Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 29019028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality of iterative reconstruction in cranial CT imaging: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR).
    Notohamiprodjo S; Deak Z; Meurer F; Maertz F; Mueck FG; Geyer LL; Wirth S
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 25097137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: image quality assessment in the cervicothoracic region.
    Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Matsuda I; Ishida M; Yasaka K; Kunimatsu A; Ohtomo K
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 23199752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image quality improvement using model-based iterative reconstruction in low dose chest CT for children with necrotizing pneumonia.
    Sun J; Yu T; Liu J; Duan X; Hu D; Liu Y; Peng Y
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Mar; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 28302073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Nagasawa N; Murashima S; Sakuma H
    BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 13():27. PubMed ID: 23927627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Iterative reconstruction: comparison of techniques for reduced-dose liver computed tomography following transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Cha MJ; Jeong WK; Choi D; Kim YK; Lim S; Choi SY; Lee WJ
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Dec; 57(12):1429-1437. PubMed ID: 26792822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
    Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.