These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Croat Med J; 2003 Dec; 44(6):770-83. PubMed ID: 14725274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Scientific reporting guidelines]. Nylenna M Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Publish wisely or perish: quality rather than quantity in medical writing. Fletcher SW; Fletcher RH Ann Acad Med Singap; 1994 Nov; 23(6):799-800. PubMed ID: 7741488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Characteristics of Retractions from Korean Medical Journals in the KoreaMed Database: A Bibliometric Analysis. Huh S; Kim SY; Cho HM PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163588. PubMed ID: 27706245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Open season: positive changes for increased transparency in the biomedical literature. Jones PM; Bryson GL Can J Anaesth; 2018 Mar; 65(3):246-253. PubMed ID: 29164529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The need to improve the quality of scientific manuscripts published in Nigerian biomedical journals. Laabes EP; Glew RH West Afr J Med; 2007; 26(2):160. PubMed ID: 17939322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Open access: is the scientific quality of biomedical publications threatened? Barreiro E Arch Bronconeumol; 2013 Dec; 49(12):505-6. PubMed ID: 24029469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Notice of retraction. Curfman GD; Morrissey S; Drazen JM N Engl J Med; 2003 Mar; 348(10):945. PubMed ID: 12578957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2009 Dec; 9(6):447-9. PubMed ID: 19965313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Retracted publications in the drug literature. Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview. Qi X; Deng H; Guo X Postgrad Med J; 2017 Aug; 93(1102):499-503. PubMed ID: 27663911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Here/In this issue and there/abstract thinking: how do we know what we know? Cautionary tales in medical publishing. Sassi RB J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2014 Jan; 53(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24342378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Correcting the literature: Improvement trends seen in contents of retraction notices. Deculllier E; Maisonneuve H BMC Res Notes; 2018 Jul; 11(1):490. PubMed ID: 30016985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. What a reviewer wants? Khetan V; Sengupta S Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 65(8):656-657. PubMed ID: 28820149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Why published research is untrustworthy. Lose G; Klarskov N Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1271-1274. PubMed ID: 28707207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Ethics in publishing medical papers]. Strâmbu I Pneumologia; 2012; 61(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 22783595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]