BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28674770)

  • 1. Choosing between Higher and Lower Resolution Microarrays: do Pregnant Women Have Sufficient Knowledge to Make Informed Choices Consistent with their Attitude?
    van der Steen SL; Bunnik EM; Polak MG; Diderich KEM; Verhagen-Visser J; Govaerts LCP; Joosten M; Knapen MFCM; Go ATJI; Van Opstal D; Srebniak MI; Galjaard RJH; Tibben A; Riedijk SR
    J Genet Couns; 2018 Feb; 27(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 28674770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening?
    van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; Ten Kate LP; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
    Genet Med; 2005; 7(5):332-8. PubMed ID: 15915085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed Decision-Making in the Context of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray.
    Baker J; Shuman C; Chitayat D; Wasim S; Okun N; Keunen J; Hofstedter R; Silver R
    J Genet Couns; 2018 Sep; 27(5):1130-1147. PubMed ID: 29516345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prenatal counseling--implications of the cultural background of pregnant women on information processing, emotional response and acceptance.
    Tschudin S; Huang D; Mor-GĂĽltekin H; Alder J; Bitzer J; Tercanli S
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E100-7. PubMed ID: 22187410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pregnant couples at increased risk for common aneuploidies choose maximal information from invasive genetic testing.
    van der Steen SL; Diderich KE; Riedijk SR; Verhagen-Visser J; Govaerts LC; Joosten M; Knapen MF; Van Opstal D; Srebniak MI; Tibben A; Galjaard RJ
    Clin Genet; 2015 Jul; 88(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 25134982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attitude, knowledge and informed choice towards prenatal screening for Down Syndrome: a cross-sectional study.
    Pop-Tudose ME; Popescu-Spineni D; Armean P; Pop IV
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Nov; 18(1):439. PubMed ID: 30419853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementing Group Prenatal Counseling for Expanded Noninvasive Screening Options.
    Gammon BL; Otto L; Wick M; Borowski K; Allyse M
    J Genet Couns; 2018 Aug; 27(4):894-901. PubMed ID: 29247311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Pregnant women's assessment and level of knowledge of prenatal counseling].
    Tschudin S; Holzgreve W; Conde N; Alder J; Bitzer J; Tercanli S
    Ultraschall Med; 2009 Apr; 30(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 18484059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening.
    van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; ten Kate LP; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):110-7. PubMed ID: 16242899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Offering a choice between NIPT and invasive PND in prenatal genetic counseling: the impact of clinician characteristics on patients' test uptake.
    van der Steen SL; Houtman D; Bakkeren IM; Galjaard RH; Polak MG; Busschbach JJ; Tibben A; Riedijk SR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2019 Feb; 27(2):235-243. PubMed ID: 30297905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent: attitudes, knowledge and information concerning prenatal examinations.
    Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1414-9. PubMed ID: 17260214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do pregnant women in Greece make informed choices about antenatal screening for Down's syndrome? A questionnaire survey.
    Gourounti K; Sandall J
    Midwifery; 2008 Jun; 24(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 17316936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
    Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a measure of informed choice suitable for use in low literacy populations.
    Dormandy E; Tsui EY; Marteau TM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jun; 66(3):278-95. PubMed ID: 17300913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of experiential knowledge and societal perceptions on decision-making regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
    Montgomery S; Thayer ZM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):630. PubMed ID: 33076858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic counselling, patient education, and informed decision-making in the genomic era.
    Metcalfe SA
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Apr; 23(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 29233487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A measure of informed choice.
    Marteau TM; Dormandy E; Michie S
    Health Expect; 2001 Jun; 4(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 11359540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The provision of information and informed decision-making on prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a questionnaire- and register-based survey in a non-selected population.
    Schoonen M; Wildschut H; Essink-Bot ML; Peters I; Steegers E; de Koning H
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jun; 87(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 22030253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dilemmas in genetic counseling for low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci detected on prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis.
    Brabbing-Goldstein D; Reches A; Svirsky R; Bar-Shira A; Yaron Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2):247.e1-247.e12. PubMed ID: 29146387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are midwifery clients in Ontario making informed choices about prenatal screening?
    Dixon V; Burton N
    Women Birth; 2014 Jun; 27(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 24656607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.