These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28675977)

  • 1. The reliability of measuring acetabular component position on radiographs using everyday diagnostic imaging software.
    Lahy J; Stevens J; McKenzie D; de Steiger R
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(2):2309499017718953. PubMed ID: 28675977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring Acetabular Cup Orientation on Antero-Posterior Radiographs of the Hip after Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Vector Arithmetic Radiological Method. Is It Valid and Verified for Daily Clinical Practice?
    Craiovan B; Weber M; Worlicek M; Schneider M; Springorum HR; Zeman F; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Rofo; 2016 Jun; 188(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 27093395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of Acetabular Component Anteversion after Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparison of Anteroposterior and Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs with Computed Tomography Scans.
    Goyal T; Paul S; Choudhury AK; Gupta T
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2021 Sep; 13(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 34484625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs.
    Park YS; Shin WC; Lee SM; Kwak SH; Bae JY; Suh KT
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Apr; 13(1):66. PubMed ID: 29609639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.
    Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M
    Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The validity and reproducibility of cross table radiographs compared with CT scans for the measurement of anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty.
    Pankaj A; Mittal A; Chawla A
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Aug; 99-B(8):1006-1011. PubMed ID: 28768776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and validity of measuring acetabular component orientation by plain anteroposterior radiographs.
    Lu M; Zhou YX; Du H; Zhang J; Liu J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Sep; 471(9):2987-94. PubMed ID: 23645336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New cross-table lateral radiography method for measuring acetabular component anteversion in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study of 93 primary THA.
    Seo H; Naito M; Nakamura Y; Kinoshita K; Nomura T; Minokawa S; Minamikawa T; Yamamoto T
    Hip Int; 2017 May; 27(3):293-298. PubMed ID: 28165589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Poor Acetabular Component Orientation Increases Revision Risk in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
    Tauriainen TJT; Niinimäki TT; Niinimäki JL; Nousiainen TOP; Leppilahti JI
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jul; 32(7):2204-2207. PubMed ID: 28291650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reliability of the anterior pelvic plane for computer navigated acetabular component placement during total hip arthroplasty: prospective study with the EOS imaging system.
    Barbier O; Skalli W; Mainard L; Mainard D;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Oct; 100(6 Suppl):S287-91. PubMed ID: 25129705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Intra-operative Fluoroscopy Significantly Improve Component Position in a Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty? Our Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital.
    Shah M; Vieira A; Mahajan A; Agrawal L; Shah D; Surme S; Velankar A
    Indian J Orthop; 2023 Feb; 57(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 36777120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pelvis and total hip arthroplasty acetabular component orientations in sitting and standing positions: measurements reproductibility with EOS imaging system versus conventional radiographies.
    Lazennec JY; Rousseau MA; Rangel A; Gorin M; Belicourt C; Brusson A; Catonné Y
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Jun; 97(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 21570378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital Planning Software Fails to Reflect Stem Torsion on Plain Radiographs after Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Worlicek M; Weber M; Zeman F; Wörner M; Schneider M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T; Craiovan B
    Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 27355814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty with and without a computer-assisted system: a prospective, randomized and controlled study.
    Gurgel HM; Croci AT; Cabrita HA; Vicente JR; Leonhardt MC; Rodrigues JC
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 23711798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Position of the acetabular cup -- accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement.
    Kalteis T; Handel M; Herold T; Perlick L; Paetzel C; Grifka J
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 May; 58(2):294-300. PubMed ID: 16289687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol.
    Arora V; Hannan R; Beaver R; Fletcher T; Harvie P
    Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Feb; 46(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 27826701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Central X-ray beam correction of radiographic acetabular cup measurement after THA: an experimental study.
    Schwarz T; Weber M; Wörner M; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Craiovan B
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 May; 12(5):829-837. PubMed ID: 27714567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability and accuracy of measuring anteversion of the acetabular component on plain anteroposterior and lateral radiographs after total hip arthroplasty.
    Shin WC; Lee SM; Lee KW; Cho HJ; Lee JS; Suh KT
    Bone Joint J; 2015 May; 97-B(5):611-6. PubMed ID: 25922453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek's safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls.
    Reina N; Putman S; Desmarchelier R; Sari Ali E; Chiron P; Ollivier M; Jenny JY; Waast D; Mabit C; de Thomasson E; Schwartz C; Oger P; Gayet LE; Migaud H; Ramdane N; Fessy MH;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):657-661. PubMed ID: 28629942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An analysis of the best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip replacement on plain radiographs.
    Nomura T; Naito M; Nakamura Y; Ida T; Kuroda D; Kobayashi T; Sakamoto T; Seo H
    Bone Joint J; 2014 May; 96-B(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 24788492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.