These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28676153)

  • 1. Picking apart surgical pick lists - Reducing variation to decrease surgical costs.
    Simon KL; Frelich MJ; Gould JC
    Am J Surg; 2018 Jan; 215(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 28676153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost variation in a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the association with outcomes across a single health system: implications for standardization and improved resource utilization.
    Brauer DG; Hawkins WG; Strasberg SM; Brunt LM; Jaques DP; Mercurio NR; Hall BL; Fields RC
    HPB (Oxford); 2015 Dec; 17(12):1113-8. PubMed ID: 26345351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementation of national practice guidelines to reduce waste and optimize patient value.
    Langell JT; Bledsoe A; Vijaykumar S; Anderson T; Zawalski I; Zimmerman J
    J Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 203(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 27363634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system's experience.
    Gitelis M; Vigneswaran Y; Ujiki MB; Denham W; Talamonti M; Muldoon JP; Linn JG
    Am J Surg; 2015 Mar; 209(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 25586597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can a simple 'cost-awareness' campaign for laparoscopic hysterectomy change the use and costs of disposable surgical supplies? Pre-post non-controlled study.
    Ross S; Lier D; Mackinnon G; Bentz C; Rakowski G; Capstick VA
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e027099. PubMed ID: 31831528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children.
    Ure BM; Lefering R; Holschneider AM
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1999 Feb; 9(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 10207696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study of added costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on surgery preference cards.
    Allen JW; Polk HC
    Am Surg; 2002 May; 68(5):474-6. PubMed ID: 12013293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs.
    Hickey M; Fields M
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining variation in cost based on surgeon choices for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adkins HH; Hardacker TJ; Ceppa EP
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2679-84. PubMed ID: 26487210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Traverso LW; Hargrave K
    Am J Surg; 1995 May; 169(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 7747829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of surgeon choice on the cost of performing laparoscopic appendectomy.
    Chu T; Chandhoke RA; Smith PC; Schwaitzberg SD
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Apr; 25(4):1187-91. PubMed ID: 20835717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regional cost analysis for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Pontarelli EM; Grinberg GG; Isaacs RS; Morris JP; Ajayi O; Yenumula PR
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 30488194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reusable vs. disposable laparoscopic instruments.
    Voyles CR
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Sep; 78(9):38-9. PubMed ID: 10128066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Slater M; Booth MI; Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Nov; 91(8):670-2. PubMed ID: 19785946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Apelgren KN; Blank ML; Slomski CA; Hadjis NS
    Surg Endosc; 1994 Jan; 8(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8153862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost containment: an experience with surgeon education and universal preference cards at two institutions.
    Embick E; Bieri M; Koehler TJ; Yang A
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):5148-5152. PubMed ID: 31844970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does Cost Influence the Choice of Disposable Versus Reusable Instruments? Mailed Survey of Obstetrician/Gynaecologists.
    Yang H; Capstick VA; Bentz C; Ross S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1416-1422. PubMed ID: 30885506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating Surgeons on Intraoperative Disposable Supply Costs: Details Matter.
    Childers CP; Hofer IS; Cheng DS; Maggard-Gibbons M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Oct; 23(10):2054-2062. PubMed ID: 30097965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is Dedicated Hot Gall Bladder List Cost Effective?
    Khan SU; Soh JY; Muhibullah N; Peleki A; Abdullah M; Waterland PW
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2019; 31(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 30868773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.