BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28676945)

  • 21. Treatment response assessment in [
    Dolci C; Spadavecchia C; Crivellaro C; De Ponti E; Todde S; Morzenti S; Turolla EA; Crespi A; Guerra L; Landoni C
    Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():177-182. PubMed ID: 30738523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.
    Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Applications of both time of flight and point spread function in brain PET image reconstruction.
    Shao X; Shao X; Wang X; Wang Y
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Apr; 37(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 26637071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimization of PET/CT image quality using the GE 'Sharp IR' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm.
    Vennart NJ; Bird N; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Nowosinska E; Heard S
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):471-479. PubMed ID: 28394818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influences of point-spread function and time-of-flight reconstructions on standardized uptake value of lymph node metastases in FDG-PET.
    Akamatsu G; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):226-30. PubMed ID: 24144448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of point spread function reconstruction on quantitative 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging parameters and inter-reader reproducibility in solid tumors.
    Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus C; Wray R; Rahmim A; Lodge MA; Subramaniam RM
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Mar; 37(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 26650959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
    Quak E; Le Roux PY; Lasnon C; Robin P; Hofman MS; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns DS; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 27283930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Standardization of image reconstruction parameters for dynamic fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
    Sharma A; Pandey AK; Mohan A; Bhalla AS; Vishnubhatla S; Sharma MC; Jain D; Thulkar S; Gupta P; Bal CS; Kumar R
    Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Dec; 39(12):1207-1217. PubMed ID: 30371603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
    Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography.
    Black QC; Grills IS; Kestin LL; Wong CY; Wong JW; Martinez AA; Yan D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1272-82. PubMed ID: 15519800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of PET reconstruction technique and matrix size on qualitative and quantitative assessment of lung lesions on [18F]-FDG-PET: A prospective study in 37 cancer patients.
    Riegler G; Karanikas G; Rausch I; Hirtl A; El-Rabadi K; Marik W; Pivec C; Weber M; Prosch H; Mayerhoefer M
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():20-26. PubMed ID: 28583635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Phantom and clinical assessment of small pulmonary nodules using Q.Clear reconstruction on a silicon-photomultiplier-based time-of-flight PET/CT system.
    Wu Z; Guo B; Huang B; Hao X; Wu P; Zhao B; Qin Z; Xie J; Li S
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10328. PubMed ID: 33990659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preliminary clinical applications of a device-dedicated whole-body positron emission tomography reconstruction method: impact on standardized uptake values.
    Daouk J; Bailly P; Fin L; Meyer ME
    Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Sep; 31(9):793-9. PubMed ID: 20634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of PET/CT image reconstruction methods and liver uptake normalization strategies on quantitative image analysis.
    Kuhnert G; Boellaard R; Sterzer S; Kahraman D; Scheffler M; Wolf J; Dietlein M; Drzezga A; Kobe C
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):249-258. PubMed ID: 26280981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A clinical evaluation of the impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm on PET FDG metrics.
    Vallot D; Caselles O; Chaltiel L; Fernandez A; Gabiache E; Dierickx L; Zerdoud S; Bauriaud M; Courbon F
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Nov; 38(11):979-984. PubMed ID: 29045338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of different segmentation algorithms on metabolic tumor volume measured on 18F-FDG PET/CT of cervical primary squamous cell carcinoma.
    Xu W; Yu S; Ma Y; Liu C; Xin J
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Mar; 38(3):259-265. PubMed ID: 28118260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does enhanced CT influence the biological GTV measurement on FDG-PET images?
    Vera P; Modzelewski R; Hapdey S; Gouel P; Tilly H; Jardin F; Ruan S; Gardin I
    Radiother Oncol; 2013 Jul; 108(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 23618503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of point spread function reconstruction on thoracic lymph node staging with 18F-FDG PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer.
    Lasnon C; Hicks RJ; Beauregard JM; Milner A; Paciencia M; Guizard AV; Bardet S; Gervais R; Lemoel G; Zalcman G; Aide N
    Clin Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 37(10):971-6. PubMed ID: 22899197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Iterative reconstruction incorporating background correction improves quantification of [
    Akerele MI; Karakatsanis NA; Forsythe RO; Dweck MR; Syed M; Aykroyd RG; Sourbron S; Newby DE; Tsoumpas C
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1875-1886. PubMed ID: 31721093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative comparison between regularized time-of-flight and OSEM PET reconstructions for small 18F-FDG-avid lesions.
    Chism CB; Ravizzini GC; Macapinlac HA; Pan T
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 28383318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.