BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

830 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28676980)

  • 21. Adjacent-level arthroplasty following cervical fusion.
    Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Konar S; Sharma A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Feb; 42(2):E5. PubMed ID: 28142281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with a new prosthesis.
    Miao J; Yu F; Shen Y; He N; Kuang Y; Wang X; Chen D
    Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):878-83. PubMed ID: 24095101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term results of the NECK trial-implanting a disc prosthesis after cervical anterior discectomy cannot prevent adjacent segment disease: five-year clinical follow-up of a double-blinded randomised controlled trial.
    Goedmakers CMW; de Vries F; Bosscher L; Peul WC; Arts MP; Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA
    Spine J; 2023 Mar; 23(3):350-360. PubMed ID: 36396007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Undergoing Total Disc Replacement.
    Pehlivanoglu T; Wuertz-Kozak K; Heider F; Sauer D; Wanke-Jellinek L; Mayer M; Mehren C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Oct; 44(20):1403-1411. PubMed ID: 31261277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of 6-year Follow-up Result of Hybrid Surgery and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for the Treatment of Contiguous Two-segment Cervical Degenerative Disc Diseases.
    Xiong Y; Xu L; Yu X; Yang Y; Zhao D; Hu Z; Li C; Zhao H; Duan L; Zhang B; Chen S; Liu T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Oct; 43(20):1418-1425. PubMed ID: 29547460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Cervical Total Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion: Results at 48 Months Follow-up.
    Hisey MS; Bae HW; Davis RJ; Gaede S; Hoffman G; Kim KD; Nunley PD; Peterson D; Rashbaum RF; Stokes J; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 May; 28(4):E237-43. PubMed ID: 25310394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.
    Coric D; Kim PK; Clemente JD; Boltes MO; Nussbaum M; James S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23140129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc.
    Coric D; Guyer RD; Nunley PD; Musante D; Carmody C; Gordon C; Lauryssen C; Boltes MO; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 29303467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.
    Janssen ME; Zigler JE; Spivak JM; Delamarter RB; Darden BV; Kopjar B
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(21):1738-47. PubMed ID: 26537161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Heterotopic ossification following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results from the prospective, multicenter, historically controlled trial comparing allograft to an optimized dose of rhBMP-2.
    Arnold PM; Anderson KK; Selim A; Dryer RF; Kenneth Burkus J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 27129045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.
    Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Effectiveness evaluation of Prodisc-C prosthesis for more than 10 years follow-up after total cervical disc replacement].
    Xu S; Liang Y; Zhu Z; Wang K; Liu H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 33(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 30983184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement.
    Mehren C; Suchomel P; Grochulla F; Barsa P; Sourkova P; Hradil J; Korge A; Mayer HM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2802-6. PubMed ID: 17108833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An 11-year minimum follow-up of the Charite III lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease.
    Lu SB; Hai Y; Kong C; Wang QY; Su Q; Zang L; Kang N; Meng XL; Wang Y
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Sep; 24(9):2056-64. PubMed ID: 25895882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cervical arthroplasty with ROTAIO® cervical disc prosthesis: first clinical and radiographic outcome analysis in a multicenter prospective trial.
    Obernauer J; Landscheidt J; Hartmann S; Schubert GA; Thomé C; Lumenta C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jan; 17():11. PubMed ID: 26759165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
    Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiological and clinical outcomes of 3-level cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Chang HK; Huang WC; Tu TH; Fay LY; Kuo CH; Chang CC; Wu CL; Lirng JF; Wu JC; Cheng H; Hsu SM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Nov; 32(2):174-181. PubMed ID: 31675702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up.
    Beaurain J; Bernard P; Dufour T; Fuentes JM; Hovorka I; Huppert J; Steib JP; Vital JM; Aubourg L; Vila T
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):841-50. PubMed ID: 19434431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cervical disc arthroplasty: 10-year outcomes of the Prestige LP cervical disc at a single level.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Shaffrey ME; Schranck FW; Copay AG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 May; 31(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 31075769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro investigation of a new dynamic cervical implant: comparison to spinal fusion and total disc replacement.
    Welke B; Schwarze M; Hurschler C; Book T; Magdu S; Daentzer D
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2247-54. PubMed ID: 26684468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.