These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28676992)
1. Topographic typology in a consecutive series of refractive surgery candidates. Mohammadi SF; Mohammadzadeh V; Kadivar S; Beheshtnejad AH; Norooznezhad AH; Hashemi SH Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 28676992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of refractive surgery candidates with Placido topography, Orbscan II, Pentacam, and wavefront analysis. Nilforoushan MR; Speaker M; Marmor M; Abramson J; Tullo W; Morschauser D; Latkany R J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 34(4):623-31. PubMed ID: 18361985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of three-dimensional optical coherence tomography and combining a rotating Scheimpflug camera with a Placido topography system for forme fruste keratoconus diagnosis. Fukuda S; Beheregaray S; Hoshi S; Yamanari M; Lim Y; Hiraoka T; Yasuno Y; Oshika T Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 97(12):1554-9. PubMed ID: 24081501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Customized photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using combined topographic and refractive data for myopia and astigmatism in eyes with forme fruste and mild keratoconus. Alpins N; Stamatelatos G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):591-602. PubMed ID: 17397730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intereye asymmetry in bilateral keratoconus, keratoconus suspect and normal eyes and its relationship with disease severity. Naderan M; Rajabi MT; Zarrinbakhsh P Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 101(11):1475-1482. PubMed ID: 28432114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Value of Corneal Epithelial and Stromal Thickness Distribution Profiles in Forme Fruste Keratoconus and Subclinical Keratoconus. Toprak I; Vega A; Alió Del Barrio JL; Espla E; Cavas F; Alió JL Cornea; 2021 Jan; 40(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 32769675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus. Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subclinical keratoconus detection with three-dimensional (3-D) morphogeometric and volumetric analysis. Toprak I; Cavas F; Velázquez JS; Alio Del Barrio JL; Alio JL Acta Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 98(8):e933-e942. PubMed ID: 32410342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ocular, corneal, and internal aberrations in eyes with keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and healthy eyes. Naderan M; Jahanrad A; Farjadnia M Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1565-1573. PubMed ID: 28647782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosis of forme fruste keratoconus with scheimpflug photography in Ghanaian patients. Lartey S; Appiagyei E BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Jul; 24(1):285. PubMed ID: 39009964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of keratoconus in Asians: role of Orbscan II and Tomey TMS-2 corneal topography. Lim L; Wei RH; Chan WK; Tan DT Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 143(3):390-400. PubMed ID: 17224118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes. Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Systematic Review of Subclinical Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus. Henriquez MA; Hadid M; Izquierdo L J Refract Surg; 2020 Apr; 36(4):270-279. PubMed ID: 32267959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data. Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mild topographic abnormalities that become more suspicious on Scheimpflug imaging. Wolf A; Abdallat W; Kollias A; Frohlich SJ; Grueterich M; Lackerbauer CA Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19123143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrastromal corneal ring segments to correct low myopia in eyes with irregular or abnormal topography including forme fruste keratoconus: 4-year follow-up. Güell JL; Morral M; Salinas C; Elies D; Gris O; Manero F J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1149-55. PubMed ID: 20610093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a Machine-Learning Classifier for Keratoconus Detection Based on Scheimpflug Tomography. Ruiz Hidalgo I; Rodriguez P; Rozema JJ; Ní Dhubhghaill S; Zakaria N; Tassignon MJ; Koppen C Cornea; 2016 Jun; 35(6):827-32. PubMed ID: 27055215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients. Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Ozulken K; Ozyol E; Akıncı A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23820305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical biomicroscopy and retinoscopy findings of keratoconus in a Middle Eastern population. Naderan M; Jahanrad A; Farjadnia M Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Jan; 101(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 28879667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]