These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28677331)

  • 1. Age-related differences in subjective recollection: ERP studies of encoding and retrieval.
    Rollins L; Riggins T
    Dev Sci; 2018 May; 21(3):e12583. PubMed ID: 28677331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The electrophysiological correlates of recent and remote recollection.
    Roberts JS; Tsivilis D; Mayes AR
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2162-71. PubMed ID: 23906539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissociable neural correlates for familiarity and recollection during the encoding and retrieval of pictures.
    Duarte A; Ranganath C; Winward L; Hayward D; Knight RT
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Feb; 18(3):255-72. PubMed ID: 14741312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in familiarity and recollection across the lifespan: an ERP perspective.
    Friedman D; de Chastelaine M; Nessler D; Malcolm B
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1310():124-41. PubMed ID: 19914220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-related differences in familiarity and recollection: ERP evidence from a recognition memory study in children and young adults.
    Czernochowski D; Mecklinger A; Johansson M; Brinkmann M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 5(4):417-33. PubMed ID: 16541812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age differences in the neural correlates of the specificity of recollection: An event-related potential study.
    Horne ED; Koen JD; Hauck N; Rugg MD
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Mar; 140():107394. PubMed ID: 32061829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the sensitivity of event-related fields to recollection and familiarity.
    Evans LH; Wilding EL
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Oct; 126():33-39. PubMed ID: 30114569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related fMRI studies of episodic encoding and retrieval: meta-analyses using activation likelihood estimation.
    Spaniol J; Davidson PS; Kim AS; Han H; Moscovitch M; Grady CL
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1765-79. PubMed ID: 19428409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the functional significance of retrieval mode: Task switching disrupts the recollection of conceptual stimulus information from episodic memory.
    Küper K
    Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 1678():1-11. PubMed ID: 28986084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sometimes we have to intentionally focus on the details: Incidental encoding and perceptual change decrease recognition memory performance and the ERP correlate of recollection.
    Haese A; Czernochowski D
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Jun; 96():1-11. PubMed ID: 25801188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intact recollection memory in high-performing older adults: ERP and behavioral evidence.
    Duarte A; Ranganath C; Trujillo C; Knight RT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 16417681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age-related ERP differences at retrieval persist despite age-invariant performance and left-frontal negativity during encoding.
    Nessler D; Johnson R; Bersick M; Friedman D
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Feb; 432(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 18226452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differentiation of subsequent memory effects between retrieval practice and elaborative study.
    Liu Y; Rosburg T; Gao C; Weber C; Guo C
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Jul; 127():134-147. PubMed ID: 28552619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Content dependence of the electrophysiological correlates of recollection.
    Johnson JD; Minton BR; Rugg MD
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):406-16. PubMed ID: 17933555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-related potentials reveal age differences in the encoding and recognition of scenes.
    Gutchess AH; Ieuji Y; Federmeier KD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1089-103. PubMed ID: 17583986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Event-related potential (ERP) evidence that encoding focus alters recollected features.
    Leynes PA; Crawford CJ
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Nov; 127():42-50. PubMed ID: 30253265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age- and performance-related differences in encoding during early childhood: insights from event-related potentials.
    Geng F; Canada K; Riggins T
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):451-461. PubMed ID: 28830307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the role of retrieval processes in the survival processing effect: Evidence from ROC and ERP analyses.
    Forester G; Kroneisen M; Erdfelder E; Kamp SM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2019 Dec; 166():107083. PubMed ID: 31491554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity.
    Curran T
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(8):1088-106. PubMed ID: 15093148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociating recollection from familiarity: electrophysiological evidence that familiarity for faces is associated with a posterior old/new effect.
    MacKenzie G; Donaldson DI
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jun; 36(2):454-63. PubMed ID: 17451972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.