440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28678576)
21. Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Jung NY; Kim SH; Choi BB; Kim SH; Sung MS
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():113. PubMed ID: 25889560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.
Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Association between semiquantitative PET parameters and molecular subtypes of breast invasive ductal carcinoma.
Chiacchio S; Evangelista L; Alsharif A; Manca G; DI Martino F; Negri A; Tredici M; Cervino AR; Puccini G; Filidei E; Ghilli M; Naccarato AG; Roncella M; Volterrani D
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Mar; 62(1):101-111. PubMed ID: 26329496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Whole Body Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Predict Survival in Patients with Adrenocortical Carcinoma.
Satoh K; Patel D; Dieckmann W; Nilubol N; Kebebew E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S714-20. PubMed ID: 26282908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Early Metabolic Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment: FDG PET/CT Criteria according to Breast Cancer Subtype.
Groheux D; Majdoub M; Sanna A; de Cremoux P; Hindié E; Giacchetti S; Martineau A; de Roquancourt A; Merlet P; Visvikis D; Resche-Rigon M; Hatt M; Espié M
Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):358-71. PubMed ID: 25915099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic and prognostic value of pretreatment SUV in 18F-FDG/PET in breast cancer: comparison with apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
Baba S; Isoda T; Maruoka Y; Kitamura Y; Sasaki M; Yoshida T; Honda H
J Nucl Med; 2014 May; 55(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 24665089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of biological and clinical aggressiveness of invasive ductal breast cancer using baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived volumetric parameters.
Ege Aktas G; Taştekin E; Sarikaya A
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 29135722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prognostic value of FDG-PET and DWI in breast cancer.
Kitajima K; Miyoshi Y; Yamano T; Odawara S; Higuchi T; Yamakado K
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 32(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 29134565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prognostic Value of Percentage Change in Metabolic Parameters as Measured by Dual-Time Point
Yoo J; Yoon HJ; Kim BS
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Oct; 26(10):1131-1137. PubMed ID: 28498790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Volume-metabolic Combined Parameters from (18)F-FDG PET/CT May Help Predict the Outcomes of Cervical Carcinoma.
Sun Y; Lu P; Yu L
Acad Radiol; 2016 May; 23(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 26853968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Do clinical, histological or immunohistochemical primary tumour characteristics translate into different (18)F-FDG PET/CT volumetric and heterogeneity features in stage II/III breast cancer?
Groheux D; Majdoub M; Tixier F; Le Rest CC; Martineau A; Merlet P; Espié M; de Roquancourt A; Hindié E; Hatt M; Visvikis D
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(11):1682-1691. PubMed ID: 26140849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Could semiquantitative FDG analysis add information to the prognosis in patients with stage II/III breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant treatment?
Evangelista L; Cervino AR; Ghiotto C; Saibene T; Michieletto S; Fernando B; Orvieto E; Guarneri V; Conte P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(11):1648-1655. PubMed ID: 26025244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Association of pharmacokinetic and metabolic parameters derived using simultaneous PET/MRI: Initial findings and impact on response evaluation in breast cancer.
Jena A; Taneja S; Singh A; Negi P; Mehta SB; Ahuja A; Singhal M; Sarin R
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jul; 92():30-36. PubMed ID: 28624017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Integrated PET/MR mammography for quantitative analysis and correlation to prognostic factors of invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kong E; Chun KA; Bae YK; Cho IH
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Mar; 62(1):118-126. PubMed ID: 26784940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic value of whole-body total lesion glycolysis at pretreatment FDG PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer.
Chen HH; Chiu NT; Su WC; Guo HR; Lee BF
Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 22692034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [The relationship between (18)F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and clinicopathological features of breast cancer].
Tang B; Zhang Y; Zhou J; Xu Y; Li TR; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 39(4):280-285. PubMed ID: 28550668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in an oncology patient population.
Kershah S; Partovi S; Traughber BJ; Muzic RF; Schluchter MD; O'Donnell JK; Faulhaber P
Mol Imaging Biol; 2013 Dec; 15(6):776-85. PubMed ID: 23632951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient with simultaneous MR/positron emission tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: comparison with 18F-FDG-PET.
Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H; Gatidis S; Brendle C; Müller M; Königsrainer I; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg AC; Schraml C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1121-8. PubMed ID: 24923481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
