These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28679008)

  • 21. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is children's listening effort in background noise influenced by the speaker's voice quality?
    Sahlén B; Haake M; von Lochow H; Holm L; Kastberg T; Brännström KJ; Lyberg-Åhlander V
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Jul; 43(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 28511620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predicting Intelligibility Deficits in Parkinson's Disease With Perceptual Speech Ratings.
    Chiu YF; Neel A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 63(2):433-443. PubMed ID: 32097080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exploring the relationship between spectral and cepstral measures of voice and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI).
    Awan SN; Roy N; Cohen SM
    J Voice; 2014 Jul; 28(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 24698884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relationship Between Speech Intelligibility and Speech Comprehension in Babble Noise.
    Fontan L; Tardieu J; Gaillard P; Woisard V; Ruiz R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 58(3):977-86. PubMed ID: 25809922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of voice quality and competing speakers in a passage comprehension task: perceived effort in relation to cognitive functioning and performance in children with normal hearing.
    von Lochow H; Lyberg-Åhlander V; Sahlén B; Kastberg T; Brännström KJ
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Apr; 43(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 28367655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relationship of cepstral analysis with voice self-assessments in dysphonic and normal speakers.
    Saeedi S; Aghajanzadeh M; Khoddami SM; Dabirmoghaddam P; Jalaie S
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Apr; 280(4):1803-1813. PubMed ID: 36229669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Cepstral Analysis of Normal and Pathologic Voice Qualities in Iranian Adults: A Comparative Study.
    Hasanvand A; Salehi A; Ebrahimipour M
    J Voice; 2017 Jul; 31(4):508.e17-508.e23. PubMed ID: 27993499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Listening to a Dysphonic Speaker in Noise May Impede Children's Spoken Language Processing in a Realistic Classroom Setting.
    Schiller IS; Morsomme D; Kob M; Remacle A
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2021 Jan; 52(1):396-408. PubMed ID: 33375854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Spectral- and cepstral-based measures during continuous speech: capacity to distinguish dysphonia and consistency within a speaker.
    Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Hahn YC
    J Voice; 2011 Sep; 25(5):e223-32. PubMed ID: 20971612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acoustic correlates of dysphonia: type and severity.
    Wolfe V; Martin D
    J Commun Disord; 1997; 30(5):403-15; quiz 415-6. PubMed ID: 9309531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of noise and proficiency on intelligibility of Chinese-accented English.
    Rogers CL; Dalby J; Nishi K
    Lang Speech; 2004; 47(Pt 2):139-54. PubMed ID: 15581189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An exploratory model of speech intelligibility for healthy aging based on phonatory and articulatory measures.
    Kuruvilla-Dugdale M; Dietrich M; McKinley JD; Deroche C
    J Commun Disord; 2020; 87():105995. PubMed ID: 32531515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech intelligibility in severe adductor spasmodic dysphonia.
    Bender BK; Cannito MP; Murry T; Woodson GE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 47(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 15072525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of Noise on Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort in Head and Neck Cancer.
    Eadie TL; Durr H; Sauder C; Nagle K; Kapsner-Smith M; Spencer KA
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Jun; 30(3S):1329-1342. PubMed ID: 33630664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Voice in Friedreich Ataxia.
    Vogel AP; Wardrop MI; Folker JE; Synofzik M; Corben LA; Delatycki MB; Awan SN
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):243.e9-243.e19. PubMed ID: 27501923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15766846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Cepstral Analysis Based on Voiced-Segment Extraction and Voice Tasks for Discriminating Dysphonic and Normophonic Korean Speakers.
    Kim GH; Bae IH; Park HJ; Lee YW
    J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):328.e11-328.e22. PubMed ID: 31640898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Impact of Nasalance on Cepstral Peak Prominence and Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio.
    Madill C; Nguyen DD; Yick-Ning Cham K; Novakovic D; McCabe P
    Laryngoscope; 2019 Aug; 129(8):E299-E304. PubMed ID: 30585334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.