These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28679261)

  • 1. Long short-term memory for speaker generalization in supervised speech separation.
    Chen J; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4705. PubMed ID: 28679261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconstruction techniques for improving the perceptual quality of binary masked speech.
    Williamson DS; Wang Y; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):892-902. PubMed ID: 25096123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of phase estimation on single-channel speech separation based on time-frequency masking.
    Mayer F; Williamson DS; Mowlaee P; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4668. PubMed ID: 28679243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The optimal ratio time-frequency mask for speech separation in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio.
    Liang S; Liu W; Jiang W; Xue W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL452-8. PubMed ID: 24181990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of binary mask patterns in automatic speech recognition in background noise.
    Narayanan A; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3083-93. PubMed ID: 23654411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of a short-time speech-based intelligibility metric to the speech transmission index and intelligibility data.
    Payton KL; Shrestha M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3818-27. PubMed ID: 24180791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Issues in forensic voice.
    Hollien H; Huntley Bahr R; Harnsberger JD
    J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):170-84. PubMed ID: 24176301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using deep learning to improve the intelligibility of a target speaker in noisy multi-talker environments for people with normal hearing and hearing loss.
    Thoidis I; Goehring T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jul; 156(1):706-724. PubMed ID: 39082692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech enhancement using empirical mode decomposition and the Teager-Kaiser energy operator.
    Khaldi K; Boudraa AO; Komaty A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):451-9. PubMed ID: 24437785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of the division between early and late reflections on intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech.
    Li J; Xia R; Fang Q; Li A; Pan J; Yan Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2801-10. PubMed ID: 25994708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational speech segregation based on an auditory-inspired modulation analysis.
    May T; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3350. PubMed ID: 25480079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.