142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28680411)
1. Assessing Boundary Conditions of the Testing Effect: On the Relative Efficacy of Covert vs. Overt Retrieval.
Sundqvist ML; Mäntylä T; Jönsson FU
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1018. PubMed ID: 28680411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of delayed judgments of learning on retention.
Tekin E; Roediger HL
Metacogn Learn; 2021; 16(2):407-429. PubMed ID: 33679269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does response mode affect amount recalled or the magnitude of the testing effect?
Putnam AL; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2013 Jan; 41(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 22898928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Covert retrieval practice benefits retention as much as overt retrieval practice.
Smith MA; Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1712-25. PubMed ID: 23815513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How crucial is the response format for the testing effect?
Jönsson FU; Kubik V; Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Jonsson B
Psychol Res; 2014 Sep; 78(5):623-33. PubMed ID: 24173813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Putting action into testing: Enacted retrieval benefits long-term retention more than covert retrieval.
Kubik V; Jönsson FU; de Jonge M; Arshamian A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Dec; 73(12):2093-2105. PubMed ID: 32686985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Writing superiority in cued recall.
Fueller C; Loescher J; Indefrey P
Front Psychol; 2013; 4():764. PubMed ID: 24151483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The testing effect in a social setting: Does retrieval practice benefit a listener?
Abel M; Roediger HL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Sep; 24(3):347-359. PubMed ID: 29172560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Time course of increased vulnerability of cholinergic neurotransmission following traumatic brain injury in the rat.
Dixon CE; Liu SJ; Jenkins LW; Bhattachargee M; Whitson JS; Yang K; Hayes RL
Behav Brain Res; 1995 Oct; 70(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 8561903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Influence of Retrieval Practice Versus Delayed Judgments of Learning on Memory: Resolving a Memory-Metamemory Paradox.
Tauber SK; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA
Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 26138299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format.
Abel M; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 27464491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Delayed memory for complex visual stimuli does not benefit from distraction during encoding.
Bartsch LM; Musfeld P
Mem Cognit; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37775710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Orthographic learning in adults through overt and covert reading.
Chrabaszcz A; Gebremedhen NI; Alvarez TA; Durisko C; Fiez JA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Nov; 241():104061. PubMed ID: 37924575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Role of Covert Retrieval in Working Memory Span Tasks: Evidence from Delayed Recall Tests.
McCabe DP
J Mem Lang; 2008 Feb; 58(2):480-494. PubMed ID: 19633737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Eyes don't lie: Eye movements differ during covert and overt autobiographical recall.
Gautier J; El Haj M
Cognition; 2023 Jun; 235():105416. PubMed ID: 36821995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of a subanesthetic concentration of nitrous oxide on overt and covert assessments of memory and associative processes.
Block RI; Ghoneim MM; Pathak D; Kumar V; Hinrichs JV
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 96(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 3146767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: clinical application of the testing effect.
Sumowski JF; Chiaravalloti N; Deluca J
Neuropsychology; 2010 Mar; 24(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 20230121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A (Preliminary) Recipe for Obtaining a Testing Effect in Preschool Children: Two Critical Ingredients.
Kliegl O; Abel M; Bäuml KT
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1446. PubMed ID: 30186194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The benefit of retrieval practice on cued recall under stress depends on item difficulty.
Klier C; Buratto LG
Neurosci Lett; 2023 Feb; 797():137066. PubMed ID: 36642238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
