These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28680789)

  • 1. Is it only the regulatory status? Broadening the debate on cisgenic plants.
    van Hove L; Gillund F
    Environ Sci Eur; 2017; 29(1):22. PubMed ID: 28680789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Will genetically modified late blight resistant potatoes be the first GM crops to be approved for commercial growing in Norway?
    Forbes E; Wulff-Vester AK; Hvoslef-Eide TAK
    Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1137598. PubMed ID: 36938038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revisiting GMOs: Are There Differences in European Consumers' Acceptance and Valuation for Cisgenically vs Transgenically Bred Rice?
    Delwaide AC; Nalley LL; Dixon BL; Danforth DM; Nayga RM; Van Loo EJ; Verbeke W
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126060. PubMed ID: 25973946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cisgenics - a sustainable approach for crop improvement.
    Telem RS; Wani SH; Singh NB; Nandini R; Sadhukhan R; Bhattacharya S; Mandal N
    Curr Genomics; 2013 Nov; 14(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 24396278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Communicating the risks of genetically modified organisms: lessons learnt from an Irish field of cisgenic potatoes.
    Mullins E
    J Exp Bot; 2019 Aug; 70(15):3699-3703. PubMed ID: 31028703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A temporal assessment of nematode community structure and diversity in the rhizosphere of cisgenic Phytophthora infestans-resistant potatoes.
    Ortiz V; Phelan S; Mullins E
    BMC Ecol; 2016 Dec; 16(1):55. PubMed ID: 27905931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are all GMOs the same? Consumer acceptance of cisgenic rice in India.
    Shew AM; Nalley LL; Danforth DM; Dixon BL; Nayga RM; Delwaide AC; Valent B
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2016 Jan; 14(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 26242818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intragenesis and cisgenesis as alternatives to transgenic crop development.
    Holme IB; Wendt T; Holm PB
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2013 May; 11(4):395-407. PubMed ID: 23421562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops.
    Lucht JM
    Viruses; 2015 Jul; 7(8):4254-81. PubMed ID: 26264020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Case studies on the use of biotechnologies and on biosafety provisions in four African countries.
    Black R; Fava F; Mattei N; Robert V; Seal S; Verdier V
    J Biotechnol; 2011 Dec; 156(4):370-81. PubMed ID: 21763362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No Tangible Effects of Field-Grown Cisgenic Potatoes on Soil Microbial Communities.
    Krause SMB; Näther A; Ortiz Cortes V; Mullins E; Kessel GJT; Lotz LAP; Tebbe CC
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2020; 8():603145. PubMed ID: 33224940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.
    Davison J; Ammann K
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):13-34. PubMed ID: 28278120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental risk assessment of blight-resistant potato: use of a crop model to quantify nitrogen cycling at scales of the field and cropping system.
    Young MW; Mullins E; Squire GR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Sep; 24(26):21434-21444. PubMed ID: 28744682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are Market GM Plants an Unrecognized Platform for Bioterrorism and Biocrime?
    Mueller S
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2019; 7():121. PubMed ID: 31192204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and Adoption of Genetically Engineered Plants for Virus Resistance: Advances, Opportunities and Challenges.
    Niraula PM; Fondong VN
    Plants (Basel); 2021 Oct; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 34834702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Updated scientific opinion on plants developed through cisgenesis and intragenesis.
    ; Mullins E; Bresson JL; Dalmay T; Dewhurst IC; Epstein MM; Firbank LG; Guerche P; Hejatko J; Moreno FJ; Naegeli H; Nogué F; Serrano JJS; Savoini G; Veromann E; Veronesi F; Casacuberta J; Dumont AF; Gennaro A; Lenzi P; Lewandowska A; Guajardo IPM; Papadopoulou N; Rostoks N
    EFSA J; 2022 Oct; 20(10):e07621. PubMed ID: 36274982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cisgenesis strongly improves introgression breeding and induced translocation breeding of plants.
    Jacobsen E; Schouten HJ
    Trends Biotechnol; 2007 May; 25(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 17383037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agricultural biotechnologies in developing countries and their possible contribution to food security.
    Ruane J; Sonnino A
    J Biotechnol; 2011 Dec; 156(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 21723334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of the First Cisgenic Apple with Increased Resistance to Fire Blight.
    Kost TD; Gessler C; Jänsch M; Flachowsky H; Patocchi A; Broggini GA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143980. PubMed ID: 26624292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulatory and Policy Considerations Around Genome Editing in Agriculture.
    Friedrichs S; Ludlow K; Kearns P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2495():327-366. PubMed ID: 35696041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.