179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28681044)
1. Masticatory function with ball and resilient telescopic anchors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: A crossover study.
Elsyad MA; Shawky AF
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(8):615-623. PubMed ID: 28681044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chewing efficiency and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle with three designs of implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A cross-over study.
Elsyad MA; Hegazy SA; Hammouda NI; Al-Tonbary GY; Habib AA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):742-8. PubMed ID: 23445173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electromyographic Connectivity of Masseter Muscle with Different Retentive Attachments for Implant Overdentures in Patients with Atrophied Mandibular Ridges: A Crossover Study.
ElSyad MA; Ibrahim AE; Nawar NHH; Belal TM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1213–1222. PubMed ID: 30892293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chewing efficiency and maximum bite force with different attachment systems of implant overdentures: a crossover study.
Elsyad MA; Khairallah AS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jun; 28(6):677-682. PubMed ID: 27118683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of mini-implant-supported mandibular overdentures on electromyographic activity of the masseter muscle during chewing of hard and soft food.
Ashmawy TM; El Talawy DB; Shaheen NH
Quintessence Int; 2014 Sep; 45(8):663-71. PubMed ID: 25019110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of different attachment systems with implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG.
Uçankale M; Akoğlu B; Ozkan Y; Ozkan YK
Gerodontology; 2012 Mar; 29(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20604812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical denture base deformation with different attachments used to stabilize implant overdentures: A crossover study.
ELsyad MA; Fathe Mahanna F; Samir Khirallah A; Ali Habib A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Feb; 31(2):162-172. PubMed ID: 31654580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in the edentulous maxilla with ball and telescopic attachments of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 4-year retrospective study.
Elsyad MA; Khairallah AS; Shawky AF
Quintessence Int; 2013 Jul; 44(7):487-95. PubMed ID: 23616978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Bar, Telescopic, and Locator Attachments for Implant-Stabilized Overdentures in Patients with Mandibular Atrophied Ridges: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
ElSyad MA; Denewar BA; Elsaih EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1103-1111. PubMed ID: 30231098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Fazekas A; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1560-8. PubMed ID: 23189311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types.
van der Bilt A; van Kampen FM; Cune MS
Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16776767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conventional versus implant-retained overlay dentures: a pilot study of masseter and anterior temporalis electromyography.
Dakhilalian M; Rismanchian M; Fazel A; Basiri K; Azadeh H; Mahmoodi M; Fayazi S; Sadr-Eshkvari P
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Aug; 40(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 25106005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient Satisfaction and Prosthetic Complications of Maxillary Implant Overdentures Opposing Mandibular Implant Overdentures with Bar, Telescopic, and Stud Attachments: A 1-Year Prospective Trial.
Fayek NH; Mahrous AI; Shaaban AAE; ELsyad MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(5):1044-1054. PubMed ID: 36170319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Masseter muscle activity of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis, and milled bar overdenture used for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation: A within-subject study.
ELsyad MA; El-Asfahani IA; Kortam SA; Mourad SI
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):408-416. PubMed ID: 33604996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single-implant, magnet-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch.
Grover M; Vaidyanathan AK; Veeravalli PT
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 23331716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Different Attachments Used for Implant-Retained Overdentures in Subjects with Resorbed Mandibles: A Crossover Trial.
Mahanna FF; Elsyad MA; Mourad SI; Abozaed HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):423-431. PubMed ID: 32142580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The masticatory efficiency of mandibular implant-supported overdentures as compared with tooth-supported overdentures and complete dentures.
Chen L; Xie Q; Feng H; Lin Y; Li J
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(5):238-43. PubMed ID: 12498473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
