These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28681046)

  • 21. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope.
    Niranjan B; Shashikiran ND; Singla S; Thakur R; Dubey A; Maran S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 27681395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.
    da Silva Telles PD; Aparecida M; Machado M; Nör JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of microabrasion on restorative materials and tooth surface.
    Chan DC; Lemke KC; Howell ML; Barghi N
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 8957920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal adaptation of compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars.
    el-Kalla IH
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 10477997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fluoride release from an orthodontic glass ionomer adhesive in vitro and enamel fluoride uptake in vivo.
    Chatzistavrou E; Eliades T; Zinelis S; Athanasiou AE; Eliades G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):458.e1-8; discussion 458-9. PubMed ID: 20362902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative evaluation of probiotic solutions on surface roughness and microhardness of different restorative materials and enamel.
    Karatas O; Delikan E; Erturk Avunduk AT
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 May; 48(3):107-119. PubMed ID: 38755989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials and on enamel restored with these materials.
    Francisconi LF; Honório HM; Rios D; Magalhães AC; Machado MA; Buzalaf MA
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18435196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chemical and morphological evaluation of enamel and dentin near cavities restored with conventional and zirconia modified glass ionomer subjected to erosion-abrasion.
    Soares LES; Melo TMTC; de Sá Brandim A; de Oliveira IR
    Microsc Res Tech; 2019 Jul; 82(7):1114-1126. PubMed ID: 30907056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Susceptibility of restorations and adjacent enamel/dentine to erosion under different salivary flow conditions.
    Alghilan MA; Cook NB; Platt JA; Eckert GJ; Hara AT
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1476-82. PubMed ID: 26476416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interfacial adaptation of in vivo aged polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) restorations in primary molars. A SEM evaluation.
    Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Dec; 2(4):184-90. PubMed ID: 10388392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Restoration-enamel interface with argon laser and visible light polymerization of compomer and composite resin restorations: a polarized light and scanning electron microscopic in vitro study.
    Hicks J; Ellis R; Flaitz C; Westerman G; Powell L
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 27(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 12924736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.
    Shabanian M; Richards LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Enamel and dentin demineralization inhibition of fluoride-releasing materials.
    Donly KJ
    Am J Dent; 1994 Oct; 7(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 7986452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lack of effect of fluoride releasing resin modified glass ionomer restorations on the contacting surface of adjacent primary molars. a clinical prospective study.
    Kotsanos N; Dionysopoulos P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 15471520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Restorative dentistry for pediatric teeth. State of the art 2001.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Mar; 132(3):379-81. PubMed ID: 11258095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.