149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28681057)
1. Comfort and exertion while using filtering facepiece respirators with exhalation valve and an active venting system among male military personnel.
Seng M; Wee LE; Zhao X; Cook AR; Chia SE; Lee VJ
Singapore Med J; 2018 Jun; 59(6):327-334. PubMed ID: 28681057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical mask placement over N95 filtering facepiece respirators: physiological effects on healthcare workers.
Roberge RJ; Coca A; Williams WJ; Palmiero AJ; Powell JB
Respirology; 2010 Apr; 15(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 20337987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physiological impact of the N95 filtering facepiece respirator on healthcare workers.
Roberge RJ; Coca A; Williams WJ; Powell JB; Palmiero AJ
Respir Care; 2010 May; 55(5):569-77. PubMed ID: 20420727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction of Carbon Dioxide in Filtering Facepiece Respirators with an Active-Venting System: A Computational Study.
Birgersson E; Tang EH; Lee WL; Sak KJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130306. PubMed ID: 26115090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of N95 respirator use with a surgical mask cover: effects on breathing resistance and inhaled carbon dioxide.
Sinkule EJ; Powell JB; Goss FL
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Apr; 57(3):384-98. PubMed ID: 23108786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physiologic and fit factor profiles of N95 and P100 filtering facepiece respirators for use in hot, humid environments.
Kim JH; Wu T; Powell JB; Roberge RJ
Am J Infect Control; 2016 Feb; 44(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 26476496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total outward leakage of half-mask respirators and surgical masks used for source control.
Myers WR; Yang W; Ryan KJ; Bergman MS; M Fisher E; Soo JC; Zhuang Z
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2023 Dec; 20(12):610-620. PubMed ID: 37682702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. N95 filtering facepiece respirator deadspace temperature and humidity.
Roberge RJ; Kim JH; Benson S
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 22413894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing mask fit and usability of traditional and nanofibre N95 filtering facepiece respirators before and after nursing procedures.
Suen LKP; Guo YP; Ho SSK; Au-Yeung CH; Lam SC
J Hosp Infect; 2020 Mar; 104(3):336-343. PubMed ID: 31545991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Respiratory protection provided by N95 filtering facepiece respirators and disposable medicine masks against airborne bacteria in different working environments].
Lu W; Zhu XC; Zhang XY; Chen YT; Chen WH
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 34(9):643-646. PubMed ID: 27866538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of Facepiece Respirators and Surgical Masks Against Surgical Smoke: Simulated Workplace Protection Factor Study.
Gao S; Koehler RH; Yermakov M; Grinshpun SA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jun; 60(5):608-18. PubMed ID: 26929204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Personalized 3D-printed frames to reduce leak from N95 filtering facepiece respirators: A prospective crossover trial in health care workers.
Chapman D; Strong C; Ullah S; Richards L; Ganesan AN
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2023 Jul; 20(7):304-314. PubMed ID: 37084394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of N95 filtering facepiece respirators on dental health professionals with an emphasis on pulmonary function and heart rate: an intrasubject comparison.
Alroudhan IE; Ganji KK; Hamza MO; Munisekhar MS; Sghaireen MG; Alam MK
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Dec; 59(10):1302-1307. PubMed ID: 34690020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Thermal burden of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Roberge R; Benson S; Kim JH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Aug; 56(7):808-14. PubMed ID: 22294505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laboratory assessment of bacterial contamination of a sterile environment when using respirators not traditionally used in a sterile field environment.
Myers W; Ajewole S; Xu S; Yorio P; Hornbeck A; Zhuang Z
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 43(12):1867-1872. PubMed ID: 35701856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-approved and CE-marked particulate filtering facepiece respirators.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 19261695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of forces generated by n95 filtering facepiece respirator tethering devices: a pilot study.
Roberge R; Niezgoda G; Benson S
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(8):517-23. PubMed ID: 22746194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Powered air-purifying respirator use in healthcare: Effects on thermal sensations and comfort.
Powell JB; Kim JH; Roberge RJ
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Dec; 14(12):947-954. PubMed ID: 28763290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total inward leakage measurement of particulates for N95 filtering facepiece respirators--a comparison study.
Rengasamy S; Walbert GF; Newcomb WE; Faulkner K; Rengasamy MM; Brannen JJ; Szalajda JV
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):206-16. PubMed ID: 24107745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
