These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28681700)

  • 1. Meta-analysis without study-specific variance information: Heterogeneity case.
    Sangnawakij P; Böhning D; Niwitpong SA; Adams S; Stanton M; Holling H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):196-210. PubMed ID: 28681700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical methodology for estimating the mean difference in a meta-analysis without study-specific variance information.
    Sangnawakij P; Böhning D; Adams S; Stanton M; Holling H
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(9):1395-1413. PubMed ID: 28168731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of heterogeneity and heterogeneity interval estimators in random-effects meta-analysis of the standardized mean difference in education and psychology.
    Boedeker P; Henson RK
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):346-364. PubMed ID: 31599614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation.
    Partlett C; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):301-317. PubMed ID: 27714841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.
    Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Blázquez-Rincón D; Sánchez-Meca J; Botella J; Suero M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 36650428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):823-38. PubMed ID: 16078388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation in meta-analyses of mean difference and standardized mean difference.
    Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
    Stat Med; 2020 Jan; 39(2):171-191. PubMed ID: 31709582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of 20 heterogeneity variance estimators in statistical synthesis of results from studies: a simulation study.
    Petropoulou M; Mavridis D
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(27):4266-4280. PubMed ID: 28815652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A generalized weighting regression-derived meta-analysis estimator robust to small-study effects and heterogeneity.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Thompson JR; Ades AE; Abrams KR; Cooper NJ
    Stat Med; 2012 Jun; 31(14):1407-17. PubMed ID: 22351645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter JR; Binder H; Schumacher M
    Biostatistics; 2011 Jan; 12(1):122-42. PubMed ID: 20656692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new measure of between-studies heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Crippa A; Khudyakov P; Wang M; Orsini N; Spiegelman D
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(21):3661-75. PubMed ID: 27161124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standard error estimation in meta-analysis of studies reporting medians.
    McGrath S; Katzenschlager S; Zimmer AJ; Seitel A; Steele R; Benedetti A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Feb; 32(2):373-388. PubMed ID: 36412105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Median bias reduction in random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Kyriakou S; Kosmidis I; Sartori N
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1622-1636. PubMed ID: 29717942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Avoiding zero between-study variance estimates in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Chung Y; Rabe-Hesketh S; Choi IH
    Stat Med; 2013 Oct; 32(23):4071-89. PubMed ID: 23670939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonparametric estimation of the random effects distribution for the risk or rate ratio in rare events meta-analysis with the arm-based and contrast-based approaches.
    Sangnawakij P; Böhning D; Holling H; Jansen K
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(4):706-730. PubMed ID: 38111986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.