These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28681700)

  • 21. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):181-198. PubMed ID: 27060925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A note on the empirical Bayes heterogeneity variance estimator in meta-analysis.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(20):3804-3816. PubMed ID: 31209917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Approximate confidence intervals for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis.
    Jackson D; Bowden J; Baker R
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Dec; 6(4):372-82. PubMed ID: 26287958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improved Fisher z estimators for univariate random-effects meta-analysis of correlations.
    Hafdahl AR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):233-61. PubMed ID: 18257972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transforming the Model T: random effects meta-analysis with stable weights.
    Malloy MJ; Prendergast LA; Staudte RG
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(11):1842-64. PubMed ID: 23097338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Q statistic with constant weights for assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Hoaglin DC; Bakbergenuly I; Newman J
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):711-730. PubMed ID: 33969638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robust variance estimation in small meta-analysis with the standardized mean difference.
    Zejnullahi R; Hedges LV
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jan; 15(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 37717978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selecting the best meta-analytic estimator for evidence-based practice: a simulation study.
    Doi SAR; Furuya-Kanamori L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2020 Mar; 18(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 31764215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes.
    Lin L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204056. PubMed ID: 30212588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range.
    Wan X; Wang W; Liu J; Tong T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():135. PubMed ID: 25524443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meta-analysis with missing study-level sample variance data.
    Chowdhry AK; Dworkin RH; McDermott MP
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(17):3021-32. PubMed ID: 26888093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigating trial and treatment heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data by means of the penalized maximum likelihood approach.
    Rondeau V; Michiels S; Liquet B; Pignon JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1894-910. PubMed ID: 18069745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On random-effects meta-analysis.
    Zeng D; Lin DY
    Biometrika; 2015 Jun; 102(2):281-294. PubMed ID: 26688589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Meta-analysis of ratios of sample variances.
    Prendergast LA; Staudte RG
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1780-99. PubMed ID: 27062644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Point-biserial correlation: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, meta-analysis, and sample size determination.
    Bonett DG
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():113-144. PubMed ID: 31565811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical Primer: heterogeneity, random- or fixed-effects model analyses?
    Barili F; Parolari A; Kappetein PA; Freemantle N
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Sep; 27(3):317-321. PubMed ID: 29868857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Jackknife empirical likelihood confidence intervals for assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis of rare binary event data.
    Wang G; Cheng Y; Chen M; Wang X
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 107():106440. PubMed ID: 34015509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.