BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28682222)

  • 1. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.
    Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. KRAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based and Economic Analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(25):1-49. PubMed ID: 23074403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type Ras Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Shi Y; Wan X; Tan C; Li J; Peng L
    Adv Ther; 2020 Feb; 37(2):847-859. PubMed ID: 31902066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-minimization analysis of panitumumab compared with cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Graham CN; Hechmati G; Fakih MG; Knox HN; Maglinte GA; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Schwartzberg LS
    J Med Econ; 2015; 18(8):619-28. PubMed ID: 25822327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of targeted therapy with cetuximab in patients with K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer presenting with initially unresectable metastases limited to the liver in a German setting.
    Asseburg C; Frank M; Köhne CH; Hartmann JT; Griebsch I; Mohr A; Osowski U; Schulten J; Mittendorf T
    Clin Ther; 2011 Apr; 33(4):482-97. PubMed ID: 21635994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III-IV follicular lymphoma (review of Technology Appraisal No. 110): a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Papaioannou D; Rafia R; Rathbone J; Stevenson M; Buckley Woods H; Stevens J
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(37):1-253, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 23021127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial.
    Wang H; Huang L; Gao P; Zhu Z; Ye W; Ding H; Fang L
    BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e030738. PubMed ID: 32051297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
    Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
    J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
    Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
    J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Prescrire Int; 2010 Oct; 19(109):219-24. PubMed ID: 21180382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-minimization analysis of biweekly dosing of cetuximab and FOLFIRI compared with panitumumab and FOLFOX for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in the United States.
    Gathirua-Mwangi WG; Sethi H; Afable MG; Bhattacharyya D; Khan T
    J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):1164-1172. PubMed ID: 34529522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy.
    Graham CN; Maglinte GA; Schwartzberg LS; Price TJ; Knox HN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Fakih MG
    Clin Ther; 2016 Jun; 38(6):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 27085587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Aflibercept in Combination with Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-Based Therapy (FOLFIRI) for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Which has Progressed Following Prior Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy: a Critique of the Evidence.
    Wade R; Duarte A; Simmonds M; Rodriguez-Lopez R; Duffy S; Woolacott N; Spackman E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 May; 33(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 25616671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab as First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.
    Shankaran V; Ortendahl JD; Purdum AG; Bolinder B; Anene AM; Sun GH; Bentley TGK
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 41(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 26398184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of beta-interferon and glatiramer acetate for treating multiple sclerosis: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Melendez-Torres GJ; Auguste P; Armoiry X; Maheswaran H; Court R; Madan J; Kan A; Lin S; Counsell C; Patterson J; Rodrigues J; Ciccarelli O; Fraser H; Clarke A
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Sep; 21(52):1-352. PubMed ID: 28914229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 67.