BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28682830)

  • 1. Temporal attention is involved in the enhancement of attentional capture with task difficulty: an event-related brain potential study.
    Sugimoto F; Kimura M; Takeda Y; Katayama J
    Neuroreport; 2017 Aug; 28(12):755-759. PubMed ID: 28682830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Underlying mechanisms of the P3a task-difficulty effect.
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Murohashi H
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):731-41. PubMed ID: 18665864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing cross-modal target transition effects with a visual-auditory oddball.
    Kiat JE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jul; 129():58-66. PubMed ID: 29723555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploiting temporal predictability: Event-related potential correlates of task-supportive temporal cue processing in auditory distraction.
    Volosin M; Grimm S; Horváth J
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():120-31. PubMed ID: 26947619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture for deviant information.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Psychophysiology; 2007 May; 44(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 17433096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can illusory deviant stimuli be used as attentional distractors to record vMMN in a passive three stimulus oddball paradigm?
    Flynn M; Liasis A; Gardner M; Boyd S; Towell T
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 197(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 19551375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study.
    Sabri M; Liebenthal E; Waldron EJ; Medler DA; Binder JR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):689-700. PubMed ID: 16768370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deviant consonance and dissonance capture attention differently only when task demand is high: An ERP study with three-stimulus oddball paradigm.
    Sanada M; Kuwamoto T; Katayama J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2021 Aug; 166():1-8. PubMed ID: 33932475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Involuntary orientation of attention to unattended deviant nociceptive stimuli is modulated by concomitant visual task difficulty. Evidence from laser evoked potentials.
    Legrain V; Bruyer R; Guérit JM; Plaghki L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2165-74. PubMed ID: 16055373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional load of the primary task influences the frontal but not the temporal generators of mismatch negativity.
    Restuccia D; Della Marca G; Marra C; Rubino M; Valeriani M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):891-9. PubMed ID: 16289727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can an auditory multi-feature optimal paradigm be used for the study of processes associated with attention capture in passive listeners?
    Tavakoli P; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 1648(Pt A):394-408. PubMed ID: 27495985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.