These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28682931)

  • 1. Understanding Anthropometric Characteristics Associated With Performance in Manual Lifting Tasks.
    Beck B; Middleton KJ; Billing DC; Caldwell JN; Carstairs GL
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Mar; 33(3):755-761. PubMed ID: 28682931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modifiable Anthropometric Characteristics Are Associated With Unilateral and Bilateral Carry Performance.
    Beck B; Carstairs GL; Billing DC; Caldwell JN; Middleton KJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Feb; 31(2):489-494. PubMed ID: 27227789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictors of Military Task Performance: Maximal Lift Capacity.
    Hydren JR; Borges AS; Sharp MA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1142-1164. PubMed ID: 28135227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can simple anthropometric and physical performance tests track training-induced changes in maximal box-lifting ability?
    Williams AG; Rayson MP
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):661-70. PubMed ID: 16720527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simple anthropometric and physical performance tests to predict maximal box-lifting ability.
    Williams AG; Wilkinson M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 May; 21(2):638-42. PubMed ID: 17530955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Box Lift and Place Assessment is Related to Performance of Several Military Manual Handling Tasks.
    Carstairs GL; Ham DJ; Savage RJ; Best SA; Beck B; Doyle TL
    Mil Med; 2016 Mar; 181(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 26926751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting Endurance Time in a Repetitive Lift and Carry Task Using Linear Mixed Models.
    Beck B; Ham DJ; Best SA; Carstairs GL; Savage RJ; Straney L; Caldwell JN
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158418. PubMed ID: 27379902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between maximal lifting capacity and maximum acceptable lift in strength-based soldiering tasks.
    Savage RJ; Best SA; Carstairs GL; Ham DJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Jul; 26 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 22643137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The sensitivity of a military-based occupational fitness test of muscular strength.
    Middleton KJ; Carstairs GL; Caldwell JN; Billing DC; Beck B
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():255-259. PubMed ID: 28166884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lift performance and lumbar loading in standing and seated lifts.
    Middleton KJ; Carstairs GL; Ham DJ
    Ergonomics; 2016 Sep; 59(9):1242-50. PubMed ID: 26772388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development of a model to predict the effects of worker and task factors on foot placements in manual material handling tasks.
    Wagner DW; Reed MP; Chaffin DB
    Ergonomics; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1368-84. PubMed ID: 20967659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximal and sub-maximal functional lifting performance at different platform heights.
    Savage RJ; Jaffrey MA; Billing DC; Ham DJ
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(5):762-9. PubMed ID: 25420678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of task resistance on the characteristics of maximal one- and two-handed lifting exertions in men and women.
    Fothergill DM; Grieve DW; Pinder AD
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1996; 72(5-6):430-9. PubMed ID: 8925813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Isoinertial tests to predict lifting performance.
    Stevenson JM; Andrew GM; Bryant JT; Greenhorn DR; Thomson JM
    Ergonomics; 1989 Feb; 32(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 2714247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterising the physical demands of critical tasks across the Royal Australian Air Force.
    Carstairs GL; Michael SW; Groeller H; Drain JR
    Work; 2024; 77(4):1319-1329. PubMed ID: 38457166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of military body armour on trunk and hip kinematics during performance of manual handling tasks (.).
    Lenton G; Aisbett B; Neesham-Smith D; Carvajal A; Netto K
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):806-12. PubMed ID: 26400048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of anthropometrics on physical employment standard performance.
    Reilly T; Spivock M; Prayal-Brown A; Stockbrugger B; Blacklock R
    Occup Med (Lond); 2016 Oct; 66(7):576-9. PubMed ID: 27261454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of basic training on material handling ability and physical fitness of British Army recruits.
    Williams AG; Rayson MP; Jones DA
    Ergonomics; 1999 Aug; 42(8):1114-24. PubMed ID: 10504891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physiological characteristics predictive of passing military physical employment standard tasks for ground close combat occupations in men and women.
    Feigel ED; Sterczala AJ; Krajewski KT; Sekel NM; Lovalekar M; Peterson PA; Koltun KJ; Flanagan SD; Connaboy C; Martin BJ; Wardle SL; O'Leary TJ; Greeves JP; Nindl BC
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2024 Sep; 24(9):1247-1259. PubMed ID: 38967991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.