138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28683338)
1. Encoding focus alters diagnostic recollection and event-related potentials (ERPs).
Leynes PA; Mok BA
Brain Cogn; 2017 Oct; 117():1-11. PubMed ID: 28683338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Event-related potential (ERP) evidence that encoding focus alters recollected features.
Leynes PA; Crawford CJ
Brain Cogn; 2018 Nov; 127():42-50. PubMed ID: 30253265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Encoding focus does not affect recollection of action memories: Event related potential (ERP) and modeling evidence.
Nardini CL; Leynes PA
Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jan; 147():9-17. PubMed ID: 31654698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of encoding focus and stereotypes on source monitoring event-related-potentials.
Leynes PA; Nagovsky I
Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 1630():171-82. PubMed ID: 26604033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neurophysiological evidence for a recollection impairment in amnesia patients that leaves familiarity intact.
Addante RJ; Ranganath C; Olichney J; Yonelinas AP
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3004-14. PubMed ID: 22898646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Event-related potential evidence that automatic recollection can be voluntarily avoided.
Bergström ZM; de Fockert J; Richardson-Klavehn A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1280-301. PubMed ID: 18702575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of directed attention at encoding on source memory retrieval in the young and old: an ERP study.
Dulas MR; Duarte A
Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 1500():55-71. PubMed ID: 23348376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The electrophysiological correlates of recent and remote recollection.
Roberts JS; Tsivilis D; Mayes AR
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2162-71. PubMed ID: 23906539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neurophysiological correlates of memory illusion in both encoding and retrieval phases.
Geng H; Qi Y; Li Y; Fan S; Wu Y; Zhu Y
Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):154-68. PubMed ID: 17239833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Event-related potentials during encoding: Comparing unitization to relational processing.
Tu HW; Alty EE; Diana RA
Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 1667():46-54. PubMed ID: 28495307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sometimes we have to intentionally focus on the details: Incidental encoding and perceptual change decrease recognition memory performance and the ERP correlate of recollection.
Haese A; Czernochowski D
Brain Cogn; 2015 Jun; 96():1-11. PubMed ID: 25801188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Masked repetition priming hinders subsequent recollection but not familiarity: A behavioral and event-related potential study.
Li B; Wang W; Gao C; Guo C
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 16(5):789-801. PubMed ID: 27197527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recognition memory for new associations: electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection.
Donaldson DI; Rugg MD
Neuropsychologia; 1998 May; 36(5):377-95. PubMed ID: 9699947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the role of retrieval processes in the survival processing effect: Evidence from ROC and ERP analyses.
Forester G; Kroneisen M; Erdfelder E; Kamp SM
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2019 Dec; 166():107083. PubMed ID: 31491554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The neural mechanism underlying recollection is sensitive to the quality of episodic memory: Event related potentials reveal a some-or-none threshold.
Murray JG; Howie CA; Donaldson DI
Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():298-308. PubMed ID: 26143201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age- and performance-related differences in encoding during early childhood: insights from event-related potentials.
Geng F; Canada K; Riggins T
Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):451-461. PubMed ID: 28830307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the sensitivity of event-related fields to recollection and familiarity.
Evans LH; Wilding EL
Brain Cogn; 2018 Oct; 126():33-39. PubMed ID: 30114569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Voices to remember: Comparing neural signatures of intentional and non-intentional voice learning and recognition.
Humble D; Schweinberger SR; Dobel C; Zäske R
Brain Res; 2019 May; 1711():214-225. PubMed ID: 30685271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intact recollection memory in high-performing older adults: ERP and behavioral evidence.
Duarte A; Ranganath C; Trujillo C; Knight RT
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 16417681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Content dependence of the electrophysiological correlates of recollection.
Johnson JD; Minton BR; Rugg MD
Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):406-16. PubMed ID: 17933555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
