These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28683338)

  • 41. Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection.
    Addante RJ; Ranganath C; Yonelinas AP
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 22548808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Electrophysiological signals associated with fluency of different levels of processing reveal multiple contributions to recognition memory.
    Li B; Taylor JR; Wang W; Gao C; Guo C
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Aug; 53():1-13. PubMed ID: 28558307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection.
    Allan K; Wilding EL; Rugg MD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1998 Apr; 98(2-3):231-52. PubMed ID: 9621832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Age-related differences in subjective recollection: ERP studies of encoding and retrieval.
    Rollins L; Riggins T
    Dev Sci; 2018 May; 21(3):e12583. PubMed ID: 28677331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: when a face seems familiar but is not remembered.
    Yovel G; Paller KA
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):789-800. PubMed ID: 14980582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The two processes underlying the testing effect- Evidence from Event-Related Potentials (ERPs).
    Liu XL; Tan DH; Reder LM
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():77-85. PubMed ID: 29474894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pre-retrieval event-related potentials predict source memory during task switching.
    Evans LH; Herron JE
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jul; 194():174-181. PubMed ID: 30910727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Variations in retrieval monitoring during action memory judgments: evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs).
    Leynes PA; Kakadia B
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Feb; 87(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 23313607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of distinctiveness and memory on lateralized and unlateralized brain-electrical activity during visual word encoding.
    Koppehele-Gossel J; Khosrowtaj Z; Gibbons H
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Aug; 134():9-20. PubMed ID: 31077993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Changes in brain electrical activity during extended continuous word recognition.
    Van Strien JW; Hagenbeek RE; Stam CJ; Rombouts SA; Barkhof F
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):952-9. PubMed ID: 15955505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Investigating the relationship between implicit and explicit memory: Evidence that masked repetition priming speeds the onset of recollection.
    Park JL; Donaldson DI
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():8-16. PubMed ID: 27291494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Event-related potentials of verbal encoding into episodic memory: dissociation between the effects of subsequent memory performance and distinctiveness.
    Fernández G; Weyerts H; Tendolkar I; Smid HG; Scholz M; Heinze HJ
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Nov; 35(6):709-20. PubMed ID: 9844432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Developmental trajectories of event related potentials related to working memory.
    Barriga-Paulino CI; Rodríguez-Martínez EI; Arjona A; Morales M; Gómez CM
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 95():215-226. PubMed ID: 28025015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Stimulus-driven attention and cognitive control during encoding: An event related brain potentials study.
    Wills-Conn K; Schroder H; Moser J; Ravizza S
    Biol Psychol; 2019 May; 144():1-10. PubMed ID: 30858074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Examining the neural basis of episodic memory: ERP evidence that faces are recollected differently from names.
    MacKenzie G; Donaldson DI
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2756-65. PubMed ID: 19505485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Electrophysiological correlates of processes supporting memory for faces.
    Yick YY; Wilding EL
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Oct; 90():50-62. PubMed ID: 24983820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Control over recollection varies with context-type: ERP evidence from the exclusion task.
    Bridger EK; Sprondel V; Mecklinger A
    Cogn Neurosci; 2015; 6(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 25564971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Distinguishing source memory and item memory: brain potentials at encoding and retrieval.
    Guo C; Duan L; Li W; Paller KA
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1118(1):142-54. PubMed ID: 16978588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Electrophysiological investigation of source memory in early childhood.
    Riggins T; Rollins L; Graham M
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2013; 38(3):180-96. PubMed ID: 23573796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Neural correlates of encoding processes predicting subsequent cued recall and source memory.
    Angel L; Isingrini M; Bouazzaoui B; Fay S
    Neuroreport; 2013 Mar; 24(4):176-80. PubMed ID: 23381350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.