560 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28683503)
41. Utility of BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions for Screening Breast MRI.
Strigel RM; Burnside ES; Elezaby M; Fowler AM; Kelcz F; Salkowski LR; DeMartini WB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1392-1399. PubMed ID: 28792802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Performance of ACR Lung-RADS in a clinical CT lung screening program.
McKee BJ; Regis SM; McKee AB; Flacke S; Wald C
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Mar; 12(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 25176499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Analysis for the breast cancer screening among urban populations in China, 2012-2013].
Mi ZH; Ren JS; Zhang HZ; Li J; Wang Y; Fang Y; Shi JF; Zhang K; Zhao JB; Dai M
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 50(10):887-892. PubMed ID: 27686767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Usefulness of combined BI-RADS analysis and Nakagami statistics of ultrasound echoes in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Dobruch-Sobczak K; Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska H; Roszkowska-Purska K; Nowicki A; Jakubowski W
Clin Radiol; 2017 Apr; 72(4):339.e7-339.e15. PubMed ID: 28038779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Cancer Yield of Incidental Breast Lesions Detected on Chest Computed Tomography.
Healey TT; Agarwal S; Patel R; Ratanaprasatporn L; Ratanaprasatporn L; Lourenco AP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(3):453-456. PubMed ID: 29016373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The chest radiologist's role in invasive breast cancer detection.
Margolies LR; Salvatore M; Yip R; Tam K; Bertolini A; Henschke C; Yankelevitz D
Clin Imaging; 2018; 50():13-19. PubMed ID: 29245142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Histologic work-up of non-palpable breast lesions classified as probably benign at initial mammography and/or ultrasound (BI-RADS category 3).
Gruber R; Jaromi S; Rudas M; Pfarl G; Riedl CC; Flöry D; Graf O; Sickles EA; Helbich TH
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 22429299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Incidence and outcomes of incidental breast lesions detected on cross-sectional imaging examinations.
Falomo E; Strigel RM; Bruce R; Munoz Del Rio A; Adejumo C; Kelcz F
Breast J; 2018 Sep; 24(5):743-748. PubMed ID: 29687537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Revisiting Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI: Analysis of Outcomes and Follow-Up Using the Updated BI-RADS Atlas.
Chikarmane SA; Michaels AY; Giess CS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1178-1184. PubMed ID: 28834447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers.
Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. MRI for the assessment of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications.
Bennani-Baiti B; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188679. PubMed ID: 29190656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A pilot study to determine the diagnostic criteria of spiculated masses for BI-RADS MRI category 5: when to perform re-biopsy after discordant pathologic result?
Onishi N; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Kawai M; Iima M; Ohashi A; Toi M; Togashi K
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 26832858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Analysis of incidental focal hypermetabolic uptake in the breast as detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT: clinical significance and differential diagnosis.
Chae EY; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Oh HY; Koh YH; Moon DH
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):530-5. PubMed ID: 22593124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Diagnostic performance of breast technologists in reading mammograms in a clinical patient population.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Mar; 64(4):442-50. PubMed ID: 20456190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Maximum intensity breast diffusion MRI for BI-RADS 4 lesions detected on X-ray mammography.
Bickelhaupt S; Paech D; Laun FB; Steudle F; Kuder TA; Mlynarska A; Bach M; Lederer W; Teiner S; Schneider S; Ladd ME; Daniel H; Stieber A; Kopp-Schneider A; Delorme S; Schlemmer HP
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):900.e1-900.e8. PubMed ID: 28687167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Potential Use of American College of Radiology BI-RADS Mammography Atlas for Reporting and Assessing Lesions Detected on Dedicated Breast CT Imaging: Preliminary Study.
Jung HK; Kuzmiak CM; Kim KW; Choi NM; Kim HJ; Langman EL; Yoon S; Steen D; Zeng D; Gao F
Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1395-1401. PubMed ID: 28728854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification?
Zhi H; Xiao XY; Ou B; Zhong WJ; Zhao ZZ; Zhao XB; Yang HY; Luo BM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3216-21. PubMed ID: 22608397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
