These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

565 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28683503)

  • 61. Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification?
    Zhi H; Xiao XY; Ou B; Zhong WJ; Zhao ZZ; Zhao XB; Yang HY; Luo BM
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3216-21. PubMed ID: 22608397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Use of BI-RADS-MRI descriptors for differentiation between mucinous carcinoma and fibroadenoma.
    Igarashi T; Ashida H; Morikawa K; Motohashi K; Fukuda K
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1092-8. PubMed ID: 27161057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsy: routine clinical experience and correlation with BI-RADS--classification and histopathology].
    Michel SC; Löw R; Singer G; Otto R; Hohl M; Kubik RA
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2007 Sep; 96(39):1459-74. PubMed ID: 17966279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
    Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Radiological features of breast cancer].
    Kettritz U
    Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 2005; 89():48-51. PubMed ID: 18035672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The clinical impact of breast scintigraphy acquired with a breast specific γ-camera (BSGC) in the diagnosis of breast cancer: incremental value versus mammography.
    Spanu A; Sanna D; Chessa F; Manca A; Cottu P; Fancellu A; Nuvoli S; Madeddu G
    Int J Oncol; 2012 Aug; 41(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 22641247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
    Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
    Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Simple rules for ultrasonographic subcategorization of BI-RADS®-US 4 breast masses.
    Jales RM; Sarian LO; Torresan R; Marussi EF; Alvares BR; Derchain S
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1231-5. PubMed ID: 23540948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Treatment-planning CT scan for breast and chest-wall irradiation: how many unexpected abnormalities could we detect?
    Kim MJ; Kim EK; Keum KC; Park BW; Son EJ; Oh KK
    Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 19006772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
    Gökalp G; Topal U
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Nonmasslike enhancement at breast MR imaging: the added value of mammography and US for lesion categorization.
    Thomassin-Naggara I; Trop I; Chopier J; David J; Lalonde L; Darai E; Rouzier R; Uzan S
    Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 21771958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Radiologist-performed hand-held ultrasound screening at average risk of breast cancer: results from a single health screening center.
    Chang JM; Koo HR; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):652-8. PubMed ID: 24951614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Adjunctive targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the work-up of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 and 4 lesions.
    Zhang XL; Guan J; Li MZ; Liu MJ; Guo Y; Zheng YL; Yang Z; Yang JY
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Aug; 60(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 27162117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Mammography in asymptomatic women aged 40-49 years.
    Silva FX; Katz L; Souza AS; Amorim MM
    Rev Saude Publica; 2014 Dec; 48(6):931-9. PubMed ID: 26039396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement.
    Gutierrez RL; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Kurland BF; Peacock S; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 19770321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Frequency of Malignancy and Imaging Characteristics of Probably Benign Lesions Seen at Breast MRI.
    Grimm LJ; Anderson AL; Baker JA; Johnson KS; Walsh R; Yoon SC; Ghate SV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):442-7. PubMed ID: 26204298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.
    Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.
    Hong AS; Rosen EL; Soo MS; Baker JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Apr; 184(4):1260-5. PubMed ID: 15788607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The Kaiser score reliably excludes malignancy in benign contrast-enhancing lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 on breast MRI high-risk screening exams.
    Milos RI; Pipan F; Kalovidouri A; Clauser P; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6052-6061. PubMed ID: 32504098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.