These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

596 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28683937)

  • 1. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Mahmud E; Naghi J; Ang L; Harrison J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(13):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 28683937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion.
    Harrison J; Ang L; Naghi J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Patel MP; Reeves RR; Mahmud E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jul; 19(5 Pt A):526-531. PubMed ID: 29221959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complex robotic compared to manual coronary interventions: 6- and 12-month outcomes.
    Walters D; Reeves RR; Patel M; Naghi J; Ang L; Mahmud E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Mar; 93(4):613-617. PubMed ID: 30456889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.
    Weisz G; Metzger DC; Caputo RP; Delgado JA; Marshall JJ; Vetrovec GW; Reisman M; Waksman R; Granada JF; Novack V; Moses JW; Carrozza JP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 61(15):1596-600. PubMed ID: 23500318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.
    Naganuma T; Chieffo A; Meliga E; Capodanno D; Park SJ; Onuma Y; Valgimigli M; Jegere S; Makkar RR; Palacios IF; Costopoulos C; Kim YH; Buszman PP; Chakravarty T; Sheiban I; Mehran R; Naber C; Margey R; Agnihotri A; Marra S; Capranzano P; Leon MB; Moses JW; Fajadet J; Lefevre T; Morice MC; Erglis A; Tamburino C; Alfieri O; Serruys PW; Colombo A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1242-9. PubMed ID: 24355114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center.
    Kagiyama K; Mitsutake Y; Ueno T; Sakai S; Nakamura T; Yamaji K; Ishimatsu T; Sasaki M; Chibana H; Itaya N; Sasaki KI; Fukumoto Y
    Heart Vessels; 2021 Jul; 36(7):955-964. PubMed ID: 33502572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Initial Australian Experience.
    Leung J; French J; Xu J; Kachwalla H; Kaddapu K; Badie T; Mussap C; Rajaratnam R; Leung D; Lo S; Juergens C
    Heart Lung Circ; 2024 Apr; 33(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 38365501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of 3-dimensional bifurcation angle on 5-year outcome of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery).
    Girasis C; Farooq V; Diletti R; Muramatsu T; Bourantas CV; Onuma Y; Holmes DR; Feldman TE; Morel MA; van Es GA; Dawkins KD; Morice MC; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1250-60. PubMed ID: 24355115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of Robotically Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Allencherril J; Hyman D; Loya A; Jneid H; Alam M
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 31(8):199-203. PubMed ID: 31088991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report.
    Smitson CC; Ang L; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M; Mahmud E
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 30(4):152-156. PubMed ID: 29335386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longitudinal Geographic Miss (LGM) in Robotic Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    Bezerra HG; Mehanna E; W Vetrovec G; A Costa M; Weisz G
    J Interv Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 28(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 26489972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after complex percutaneous coronary intervention using forearm approach.
    Koutouzis M; Karatasakis A; Brilakis ES; Agelaki M; Maniotis C; Dimitriou P; Lazaris E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017 Jun; 18(4):245-249. PubMed ID: 28214141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Case-Control analysis of a dedicated self-expanding Biolimus A9-eluting Bifurcation stent versus provisional or mandatory side branch intervention strategies in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.
    Ohlow MA; Farah A; Richter S; El-Garhy M; von Korn H; Lauer B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 90(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 27651317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach.
    Smilowitz NR; Moses JW; Sosa FA; Lerman B; Qureshi Y; Dalton KE; Privitera LT; Canone-Weber D; Singh V; Leon MB; Weisz G
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 26(7):318-21. PubMed ID: 24993988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementation of Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Into a High-Risk PCI Program.
    Chitturi KR; Kanake S; Nguyen T; Loc B; Baden K; Bavishi C; Kumar A; Liu Z; Chan A; Karuparthi PR; Hirai T
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Oct; 43():115-119. PubMed ID: 35610138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. First-in-human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis.
    Mahmud E; Dominguez A; Bahadorani J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 88(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 27189238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utility of the ACC/AHA lesion classification as a predictor of procedural, 30-day and 12-month outcomes in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era.
    Theuerle J; Yudi MB; Farouque O; Andrianopoulos N; Scott P; Ajani AE; Brennan A; Duffy SJ; Reid CM; Clark DJ;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 92(3):E227-E234. PubMed ID: 29139601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Major Predictors of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions With 2-Stent Strategy: Patient-Level Analysis of the Korean Bifurcation Pooled Cohorts.
    Song PS; Song YB; Lee JM; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Choi JH; Lee SH; Park KW; Kim HS; Jang Y; Seung KB; Oh JH; Gwon HC
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Sep; 9(18):1879-86. PubMed ID: 27592016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the R-One robotic system for percutaneous coronary intervention: the R-EVOLUTION study.
    Durand E; Sabatier R; Smits PC; Verheye S; Pereira B; Fajadet J
    EuroIntervention; 2023 Apr; 18(16):e1339-e1347. PubMed ID: 36602883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of radiological risk during coronary angioplasty procedures: comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches.
    Iwachow P; Miechowicz I; Kałmucki P; Dziki B; Szyszka A; Baszko A; Siminiak T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1297-1303. PubMed ID: 28364175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.