265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28684321)
1. Feasibility of using continuous chromatography in downstream processing: Comparison of costs and product quality for a hybrid process vs. a conventional batch process.
Ötes O; Flato H; Winderl J; Hubbuch J; Capito F
J Biotechnol; 2017 Oct; 259():213-220. PubMed ID: 28684321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transfer of a three step mAb chromatography process from batch to continuous: Optimizing productivity to minimize consumable requirements.
Gjoka X; Gantier R; Schofield M
J Biotechnol; 2017 Jan; 242():11-18. PubMed ID: 27939321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving affinity chromatography resin efficiency using semi-continuous chromatography.
Mahajan E; George A; Wolk B
J Chromatogr A; 2012 Mar; 1227():154-62. PubMed ID: 22265178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Large-scale monoclonal antibody purification by continuous chromatography, from process design to scale-up.
Girard V; Hilbold NJ; Ng CK; Pegon L; Chahim W; Rousset F; Monchois V
J Biotechnol; 2015 Nov; 213():65-73. PubMed ID: 25962790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removal of B. cereus cereulide toxin from monoclonal antibody bioprocess feed via two-step Protein A affinity and multimodal chromatography.
Wetterhall M; Grönberg A; Grönlund S; Björkman T; Sandberg L; Musunuri S; Chaloupka K; Gammell P
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2019 Jun; 1118-1119():194-202. PubMed ID: 31059926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Twin-column CaptureSMB: a novel cyclic process for protein A affinity chromatography.
Angarita M; Müller-Späth T; Baur D; Lievrouw R; Lissens G; Morbidelli M
J Chromatogr A; 2015 Apr; 1389():85-95. PubMed ID: 25748537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomanufacturing evolution from conventional to intensified processes for productivity improvement: a case study.
Xu J; Xu X; Huang C; Angelo J; Oliveira CL; Xu M; Xu X; Temel D; Ding J; Ghose S; Borys MC; Li ZJ
MAbs; 2020 Jan; 12(1):1770669. PubMed ID: 32425110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of protein A chromatographic stationary phases: performance characteristics for monoclonal antibody purification.
Liu Z; Mostafa SS; Shukla AA
Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2015; 62(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 24823474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scale-up of continuous multicolumn chromatography for the protein a capture step: From bench to clinical manufacturing.
Ötes O; Flato H; Vazquez Ramirez D; Badertscher B; Bisschops M; Capito F
J Biotechnol; 2018 Sep; 281():168-174. PubMed ID: 30025795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maximizing binding capacity for protein A chromatography.
Ghose S; Zhang J; Conley L; Caple R; Williams KP; Cecchini D
Biotechnol Prog; 2014; 30(6):1335-40. PubMed ID: 25138962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choices of capture chromatography technology in antibody manufacturing processes.
DiLeo M; Ley A; Nixon AE; Chen J
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2017 Nov; 1068-1069():136-148. PubMed ID: 29069629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimising the design and operation of semi-continuous affinity chromatography for clinical and commercial manufacture.
Pollock J; Bolton G; Coffman J; Ho SV; Bracewell DG; Farid SS
J Chromatogr A; 2013 Apr; 1284():17-27. PubMed ID: 23453463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Caprylic acid-induced impurity precipitation from protein A capture column elution pool to enable a two-chromatography-step process for monoclonal antibody purification.
Zheng J; Wang L; Twarowska B; Laino S; Sparks C; Smith T; Russell R; Wang M
Biotechnol Prog; 2015; 31(6):1515-25. PubMed ID: 26280674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Design and operation of a continuous integrated monoclonal antibody production process.
Steinebach F; Ulmer N; Wolf M; Decker L; Schneider V; Wälchli R; Karst D; Souquet J; Morbidelli M
Biotechnol Prog; 2017 Sep; 33(5):1303-1313. PubMed ID: 28691347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of batch and continuous multi-column protein A capture processes by optimal design.
Baur D; Angarita M; Müller-Späth T; Steinebach F; Morbidelli M
Biotechnol J; 2016 Jul; 11(7):920-31. PubMed ID: 26992151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protein A affinity chromatography of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell culture broths containing biopharmaceutical monoclonal antibody (mAb): Experiments and mechanistic transport, binding and equilibrium modeling.
Grom M; Kozorog M; Caserman S; Pohar A; Likozar B
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2018 Apr; 1083():44-56. PubMed ID: 29522957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancing protein A productivity and resin utilization within integrated or intensified processes.
Brinkmann A; Elouafiq S
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2021 Sep; 118(9):3359-3366. PubMed ID: 33638385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of continuous nonaffinity capture chromatography for a recombinant enzyme-optimization for a changing perfusion feedstream and comparison to batch processing.
Thompson C; Wilson K; Larkin C; Lee J; Wang WK; Wendeler M
Biotechnol Prog; 2018 Sep; 34(5):1195-1204. PubMed ID: 30094961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new, integrated, continuous purification process template for monoclonal antibodies: Process modeling and cost of goods studies.
Xenopoulos A
J Biotechnol; 2015 Nov; 213():42-53. PubMed ID: 25959171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Continuous multi-column capture of monoclonal antibodies with convective diffusive membrane adsorbers.
Schmitz F; Knöchelmann E; Kruse T; Minceva M; Kampmann M
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2024 Jun; 121(6):1859-1875. PubMed ID: 38470343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]