These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28685399)
1. Reliability of a four-column classification for tibial plateau fractures. Martínez-Rondanelli A; Escobar-González SS; Henao-Alzate A; Martínez-Cano JP Int Orthop; 2017 Sep; 41(9):1881-1886. PubMed ID: 28685399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomography-based Three-Column Classification in tibial plateau fractures: introduction of its utility and assessment of its reproducibility. Zhu Y; Yang G; Luo CF; Smith WR; Hu CF; Gao H; Zhong B; Zeng BF J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Sep; 73(3):731-7. PubMed ID: 22929503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two column classification of tibial plateau fractures; description, clinical application and reliability. Anwar A; Zhang Y; Zhao Z; Gao Y; Sha L; Lv D; Zhang Z; Lv G; Zhang Y; Nazir MU; Qasim W; Wang Y Injury; 2019 Jun; 50(6):1247-1255. PubMed ID: 31040027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-column classification and Schatzker classification: a three- and two-dimensional computed tomography characterisation and analysis of tibial plateau fractures. Patange Subba Rao SP; Lewis J; Haddad Z; Paringe V; Mohanty K Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Oct; 24(7):1263-70. PubMed ID: 24013813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tibial plateau fractures: reproducibility of three classifications (Schatzker, AO, Duparc) and a revised Duparc classification. Gicquel T; Najihi N; Vendeuvre T; Teyssedou S; Gayet LE; Huten D Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Nov; 99(7):805-16. PubMed ID: 24120208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability assessment of tibial plateau fracture classification systems. Taşkesen A; Demirkale İ; Okkaoğlu MC; Özdemir M; Bilgili MG; Altay M Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2017 Dec; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 29125816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic literature review of tibial plateau fractures: What classifications are used and how reliable and useful are they? Millar SC; Arnold JB; Thewlis D; Fraysse F; Solomon LB Injury; 2018 Mar; 49(3):473-490. PubMed ID: 29395219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and characterisation of tibial plateau fractures. Doornberg JN; Rademakers MV; van den Bekerom MP; Kerkhoffs GM; Ahn J; Steller EP; Kloen P Injury; 2011 Dec; 42(12):1416-25. PubMed ID: 21570072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter- and intra-observer variation of the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications of tibial plateau fractures and a proposal of a new classification system. Charalambous CP; Tryfonidis M; Alvi F; Moran M; Fang C; Samarji R; Hirst P Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 May; 89(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 17535620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver reliability of the Schatzker and Luo classification systems for tibial plateau fractures. Mellema JJ; Doornberg JN; Molenaars RJ; Ring D; Kloen P; Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):944-9. PubMed ID: 26777468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of intra and inter observer reliability of the five used classification systems of tibial plateau fractures. Koksal A; Abul K; Kargın D; Cimen O; Mert M; Keskin A Acta Orthop Belg; 2022 Dec; 88(4):805-810. PubMed ID: 36800667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the most reproducible classification system to assess tibial plateau fractures? Millán-Billi A; Gómez-Masdeu M; Ramírez-Bermejo E; Ibañez M; Gelber PE Int Orthop; 2017 Jun; 41(6):1251-1256. PubMed ID: 28405810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The classification systems for tibial plateau fractures: how reliable are they? Maripuri SN; Rao P; Manoj-Thomas A; Mohanty K Injury; 2008 Oct; 39(10):1216-21. PubMed ID: 18439607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classification systems for tibial plateau fractures; does computed tomography scanning improve their reliability? Brunner A; Horisberger M; Ulmar B; Hoffmann A; Babst R Injury; 2010 Feb; 41(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 19744652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging increases the reliability of classification systems for tibial plateau fractures. Hu YL; Ye FG; Ji AY; Qiao GX; Liu HF Injury; 2009 Dec; 40(12):1282-5. PubMed ID: 19535056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A revised 3-column classification approach for the surgical planning of extended lateral tibial plateau fractures. Hoekstra H; Kempenaers K; Nijs S Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2017 Oct; 43(5):637-643. PubMed ID: 27277073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra- and inter-observer reliability assessment of widely used classifications and the "Ten-segment classification" of tibial plateau fractures. Yao P; Liu Y; Shan L; Zhao Y; Wang D; He Y; Wang H; Zeeshan Waheed M; Lu T; Zhou J Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():149-156. PubMed ID: 35313243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The AO classification system for tibial plateau fractures: An independent inter and intraobserver agreement study. Besa P; Angulo M; Vial R; Vega R; Irribarra L; Lobos D; Sandoval F; Irarrázaval S Injury; 2023 Nov; 54 Suppl 6():110741. PubMed ID: 38143118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. AO or Schatzker? How reliable is classification of tibial plateau fractures? Walton NP; Harish S; Roberts C; Blundell C Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Oct; 123(8):396-8. PubMed ID: 14574596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The pivotal role of the coronal fracture line for a new three-dimensional CT-based fracture classification of bicondylar proximal tibial fractures. Pätzold R; Friederichs J; von Rüden C; Panzer S; Bühren V; Augat P Injury; 2017 Oct; 48(10):2214-2220. PubMed ID: 28711171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]